Mark J. Mellon
- Accounting top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Strategy and Management
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Douglas E. StevensJessen L. HobsonAllen D. BlayKathryn M. KimeryWalter R. NordThomas Smith
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Business EthicsJournal of the Association for Information SystemsAuditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Mellon
18 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Accounting 134
- Safety Research 85
- Strategy and Management 53
- Management Information Systems 52
- Information Systems and Management 50
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Mellon
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Mellon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Mellon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Mellon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Mellon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Mellon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Mellon. The network helps show where Mark J. Mellon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. Mellon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. Mellon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. Mellon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. Mellon. Mark J. Mellon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 81 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Association between Financial Literacy and Trust in Financial Markets among Novice Nonprofessional Investors | 10 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 78 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | Gendered Patterns in Academic Authorship: Examples from the Management Information Systems Discipline | 2 |
About Mark J. Mellon
Mark J. Mellon is a scholar working on Accounting, Safety Research and Information Systems and Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (134 citations), Safety Research (85 citations) and Information Systems and Management (50 citations). Mark J. Mellon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas E. Stevens, Jessen L. Hobson, Allen D. Blay, Kathryn M. Kimery, Walter R. Nord and Thomas Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.