Thomas Smith

988 total citations
32 papers, 647 citations indexed

About

Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Smith has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 647 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Accounting, 12 papers in Strategy and Management and 8 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Thomas Smith's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (17 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers). Thomas Smith is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (26 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (17 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers). Thomas Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas Smith's co-authors include Marissa King, Marc Schneiberg, Robert Pinsker, Julia L. Higgs, Mark J. Kohlbeck, George R. Young, Yiyang Zhang, Dahlia Robinson, Johan Perols and James S. Ang and has published in prestigious journals such as American Sociological Review, The Accounting Review and Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Smith

28 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Smith United States	11	326	256	130	107	94	32	647
Ayman Abdalmajeed Alsmadi Jordan	17	170 0.5×	134 0.5×	144 1.1×	94 0.9×	38 0.4×	43	630
Yiwei Fang United States	15	491 1.5×	178 0.7×	44 0.3×	54 0.5×	394 4.2×	38	760
Iris H‐Y Chiu United Kingdom	10	99 0.3×	163 0.6×	102 0.8×	43 0.4×	111 1.2×	74	451
Marco Maffei Italy	12	144 0.4×	93 0.4×	58 0.4×	46 0.4×	39 0.4×	40	377
Anastasia Giakoumelou Italy	12	214 0.7×	345 1.3×	42 0.3×	23 0.2×	58 0.6×	28	588
Danson Kimani United Kingdom	11	168 0.5×	156 0.6×	111 0.9×	36 0.3×	59 0.6×	20	473
Mostafa Kamal Hassan United Arab Emirates	13	606 1.9×	267 1.0×	23 0.2×	37 0.3×	115 1.2×	40	784
Hany Elbardan United Kingdom	10	241 0.7×	288 1.1×	28 0.2×	32 0.3×	31 0.3×	32	588
Alessandro Merendino United Kingdom	8	162 0.5×	163 0.6×	30 0.2×	57 0.5×	18 0.2×	20	430
Christopher J. Skousen United States	13	550 1.7×	348 1.4×	56 0.4×	72 0.7×	71 0.8×	34	765

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Smith. Thomas Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zhang, Yimei & Thomas Smith. (2023). The impact of customer firm data breaches on the audit fees of their suppliers. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 50. 100628–100628. 5 indexed citations

Zhang, Yimei & Thomas Smith. (2022). The Impact of Customer Firm Data Breaches on the Audit Fees of Their Suppliers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Kohlbeck, Mark J., et al.. (2022). Auditor pricing of abnormal income from sales of available for sale securities: evidence from the banking industry. Accounting and Business Research. 53(6). 611–645.

Higgs, Julia L., et al.. (2021). An Examination of Audit Quality Surrounding Within-Firm Engagement Office Changes. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 39(1). 255–277. 2 indexed citations

Smith, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Accrual Management and the Decision to Sell or Hold Shares Acquired from the Exercise of Employee Stock Options. 5(1). 115–134.

Murthy, Uday S., et al.. (2019). The Effects of Information Systems Compatibility on Firm Performance following Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Information Systems. 34(2). 211–233. 9 indexed citations

Murthy, Uday S., et al.. (2019). The Effects of Information Systems Compatibility on Firm Performance Following Mergers and Acquisitions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Mellon, Mark J., et al.. (2019). What Does an Executive Stock Sale Tell the Market? Evidence From Sale Transactions Following Stock Option Exercises. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 36(3). 613–642. 1 indexed citations

Robinson, Dahlia, et al.. (2018). DOES MANAGERIAL OPPORTUNISM EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENTIAL PRICING OF LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE ESTIMATES?. The Journal of Financial Research. 41(2). 253–289. 9 indexed citations

10.

Smith, Thomas, Julia L. Higgs, & Robert Pinsker. (2018). Do Auditors Price Breach Risk in Their Audit Fees. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

11.

Smith, Thomas, Julia L. Higgs, & Robert Pinsker. (2018). Do Auditors Price Breach Risk in Their Audit Fees?. Journal of Information Systems. 33(2). 177–204. 61 indexed citations

12.

Kohlbeck, Mark J., et al.. (2016). Auditors and Net Transfers Into Level 3 Fair-Valued Financial Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

13.

Kohlbeck, Mark J., et al.. (2016). Auditors and net transfers of Level 3 fair-valued financial instruments. Advances in Accounting. 36. 27–39. 12 indexed citations

14.

Higgs, Julia L., Robert Pinsker, Thomas Smith, & George R. Young. (2016). The Relationship between Board-Level Technology Committees and Reported Security Breaches. Journal of Information Systems. 30(3). 79–98. 136 indexed citations

15.

Dunn, Kimberly, Mark J. Kohlbeck, & Thomas Smith. (2015). Bargain Purchase Gains in the Acquisitions of Failed Banks. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance. 31(3). 388–412. 11 indexed citations

16.

Smith, Thomas, et al.. (2013). The Effect of Noisy Fair Value Measures on Bank Capital Adequacy Ratios. Accounting Horizons. 27(4). 693–710. 19 indexed citations

17.

Morton, Richard M., et al.. (2013). Accrual Management and the Decision to Hold the Shares Acquired from the Exercise of Executive Stock Options. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

18.

Smith, Thomas, et al.. (2009). Do Taxes Matter: Evidence of Individual and Corporate Tax Incentives on the Choice to Hold Shares Acquired from Exercise of Employee Stock Options. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

19.

Schneiberg, Marc, Marissa King, & Thomas Smith. (2008). Social Movements and Organizational Form: Cooperative Alternatives to Corporations in the American Insurance, Dairy, and Grain Industries. American Sociological Review. 73(4). 635–667. 193 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Karl U. & Thomas Smith. (1993). Human-Computer Interaction and the Automation of Work.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 837–842. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact