Romane Clark

611 citations
24 papers · 232 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Romane Clark

19 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

Romane Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Philosophy 100
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 108
  • History and Philosophy of Science 34
  • Language and Linguistics 34
  • General Psychology 4
Replace Les Holborow with:
Les Holborow United Kingdom
Dennis W. Stampe United States
Bruce Vermazen United States
Sofia Miguéns Portugal
Mark Crimmins United States
Josh Dever United States
Isidora Stojanovic France
Michael McKinsey United States
John Oliver Perry
N. Ángel Pinillos United States
Romane Clark relative to Les Holborow United Kingdom Les Holborow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Les Holborow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Romane Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Romane Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Romane Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romane Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Romane Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Romane Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Romane Clark. The network helps show where Romane Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Romane Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Romane Clark Line = papers co-authored together Romane Clark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198372
2 197060
3 197819
4 198213
5 197311
6 198810
7 20139
8 19767
9
Introduction to Logic
19625
10 19804
11 19864
12 19893
13 19873
14 19812
15 19792
16 19672
17 19821
18 19521
19 19561
20 19881

About Romane Clark

Romane Clark is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (100 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (108 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (34 citations), Language and Linguistics (34 citations) and General Psychology (4 citations). Romane Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Yueh‐Ting Lee and Paul Welsh. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, Synthese, Theoria, Philosophical Perspectives and Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact