Michael Glanzberg
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Glanzberg
23 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 306
- Philosophy 246
- Artificial Intelligence 134
- Language and Linguistics 96
- History and Philosophy of Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Glanzberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Glanzberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Glanzberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Glanzberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Glanzberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Glanzberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Glanzberg. The network helps show where Michael Glanzberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Glanzberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Glanzberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Glanzberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Glanzberg. Michael Glanzberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Binding, compositionality, and semantic values | 11 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Formal Theories of Truth | 5 |
| 5 | Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon | 9 |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | The Liar Paradox | 1 |
| 8 | Not All Contextual Parameters Are Alike | 9 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 122 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | Definite Descriptions and Quantifier Scope: Some Mates Cases Reconsidered | 8 |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Michael Glanzberg
Michael Glanzberg is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (306 citations), Philosophy (246 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (84 citations). Michael Glanzberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Susanna Siegel, Jeffrey C. King, Jc Beall, Anil K. Gupta and David Ripley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.