Historical Materialism

933 papers and 7.3k indexed citations

About

The 933 papers published in Historical Materialism in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Historical Materialism usually cover Sociology and Political Science (563 papers), Political Science and International Relations (151 papers) and Philosophy (103 papers) specifically the topics of Political Economy and Marxism (373 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (101 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historical Materialism are Costas Lapavitsas, Massimo De Angelis, Carlo Vercellone, Jairus Banaji, Andreas Malm, David McNally, Gregor Gall, Jonathan Joseph, Ben Fine and Esther Leslie.

In The Last Decade

Historical Materialism

585 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Historical Materialism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historical Materialism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historical Materialism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historical Materialism more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Historical Materialism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historical Materialism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historical Materialism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026