Mark Blokpoel
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 3
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Language and cultural evolution 6
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development 7
-
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 6
- Cognitive Science and Mapping 4
- AI-based Problem Solving and Planning 3
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 4
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 4
Mark Blokpoel
23 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- General Decision Sciences 24
- History and Philosophy of Science 40
- Cultural Studies 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 128
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Blokpoel
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Blokpoel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Blokpoel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Blokpoel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Blokpoel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Blokpoel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Blokpoel. The network helps show where Mark Blokpoel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Blokpoel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 8 | Cognition and Intractability : A Guide to Classical and Parameterized Complexity Analysis | 2019 | 28 |
| 9 | Mindshaping the world can make mindreading tractable: Bridging the gap between philosophy and computational complexity analysis | 2017 | 2 |
| 10 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 17 | Neural mechanisms of human communicative innovations | 2012 | 3 |
| 18 | The computational costs of recipient design and intention recognition in communication | 2011 | 4 |
| 19 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 20 | How Action Understanding can be Rational, Bayesian and Tractable | 2010 | 13 |
About Mark Blokpoel
Mark Blokpoel is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cultural Studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (6 papers), Language and cultural evolution (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (3 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (24 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (40 citations) and Cultural Studies (55 citations). Mark Blokpoel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Iris van Rooij, Johan Kwisthout, Todd Wareham, Ivan Toni, Arjen Stolk, Pim Haselager, Marlieke Van Kesteren, Ronald de Haan, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen and Lennart Verhagen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.