Mark Blokpoel

745 total citations
23 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

Mark Blokpoel is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cultural Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Blokpoel has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 6 papers in Cultural Studies. Recurrent topics in Mark Blokpoel's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (6 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (6 papers). Mark Blokpoel is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (6 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (6 papers). Mark Blokpoel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Germany. Mark Blokpoel's co-authors include Iris van Rooij, Johan Kwisthout, Todd Wareham, Ivan Toni, Arjen Stolk, Pim Haselager, Marlieke Van Kesteren, Ronald de Haan, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen and Lennart Verhagen and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mark Blokpoel

23 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Blokpoel Netherlands 12 128 107 85 73 57 23 342
Jean Baratgin France 15 91 0.7× 242 2.3× 93 1.1× 148 2.0× 84 1.5× 46 575
Olivia Guest United Kingdom 9 169 1.3× 104 1.0× 46 0.5× 51 0.7× 70 1.2× 16 390
Daniel C. Dennett 5 111 0.9× 33 0.3× 60 0.7× 36 0.5× 62 1.1× 5 246
Ronaldo Vigo United States 10 88 0.7× 98 0.9× 55 0.6× 134 1.8× 70 1.2× 33 335
Robert W. Clowes United Kingdom 13 227 1.8× 47 0.4× 99 1.2× 35 0.5× 44 0.8× 30 394
Diana Raffman United States 11 140 1.1× 69 0.6× 34 0.4× 34 0.5× 204 3.6× 25 409
Isabel Orenes Spain 10 153 1.2× 115 1.1× 51 0.6× 117 1.6× 133 2.3× 18 375
Michael Rescorla United States 14 203 1.6× 72 0.7× 60 0.7× 40 0.5× 168 2.9× 30 463
Lloyd K. Komatsu United States 8 120 0.9× 89 0.8× 87 1.0× 221 3.0× 131 2.3× 10 458
Georg Theiner United States 7 154 1.2× 29 0.3× 88 1.0× 36 0.5× 47 0.8× 10 280

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Blokpoel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Blokpoel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Blokpoel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Blokpoel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Blokpoel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Blokpoel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Blokpoel. The network helps show where Mark Blokpoel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Blokpoel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Blokpoel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Blokpoel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Blokpoel. Mark Blokpoel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blokpoel, Mark, Mark Dingemanse, Christian F. Doeller, et al.. (2022). The CABB dataset: A multimodal corpus of communicative interactions for behavioural and neural analyses. NeuroImage. 264. 119734–119734. 7 indexed citations
2.
Haan, Ronald de, et al.. (2021). Why is scaling up models of language evolution hard?. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 5 indexed citations
3.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2020). How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation. Topics in Cognitive Science. 12(4). 1382–1402. 13 indexed citations
4.
Dingemanse, Mark, et al.. (2020). A simple repair mechanism can alleviate computational demands of pragmatic reasoning: simulations and complexity analysis. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 177–194. 12 indexed citations
5.
Rooij, Iris van & Mark Blokpoel. (2020). Formalizing Verbal Theories. Social Psychology. 51(5). 285–298. 38 indexed citations
6.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2019). Naturalism, tractability and the adaptive toolbox. Synthese. 198(6). 5749–5784. 10 indexed citations
7.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2019). Quantifying free behaviour in an open field using k-motif approach. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 19873–19873. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rooij, Iris van, Mark Blokpoel, Johan Kwisthout, & Todd Wareham. (2019). Cognition and Intractability : A Guide to Classical and Parameterized Complexity Analysis. 28 indexed citations
9.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2017). Mindshaping the world can make mindreading tractable: Bridging the gap between philosophy and computational complexity analysis. Cognitive Science. 1418–1423. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kokal, Idil, Mark Blokpoel, Rui Liu, et al.. (2017). Oxytocin modulates human communication by enhancing cognitive exploration. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 86. 64–72. 5 indexed citations
11.
Blokpoel, Mark. (2017). Sculpting Computational‐Level Models. Topics in Cognitive Science. 10(3). 641–648. 10 indexed citations
12.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2017). Demons of Ecological Rationality. Cognitive Science. 42(3). 1057–1066. 15 indexed citations
13.
Blokpoel, Mark, Johan Kwisthout, Theo P. van der Weide, Todd Wareham, & Iris van Rooij. (2013). A computational-level explanation of the speed of goal inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 57(3-4). 117–133. 13 indexed citations
14.
Stolk, Arjen, Lennart Verhagen, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen, et al.. (2013). Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(36). 14574–14579. 42 indexed citations
15.
Blokpoel, Mark, Marlieke Van Kesteren, Arjen Stolk, et al.. (2012). Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 6. 253–253. 40 indexed citations
16.
Blokpoel, Mark, Johan Kwisthout, & Iris van Rooij. (2012). When Can Predictive Brains be Truly Bayesian?. Frontiers in Psychology. 3. 406–406. 13 indexed citations
17.
Stolk, Arjen, Lennart Verhagen, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen, et al.. (2012). Neural mechanisms of human communicative innovations. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations
18.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2011). The computational costs of recipient design and intention recognition in communication. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 465–470. 4 indexed citations
19.
Rooij, Iris van, Johan Kwisthout, Mark Blokpoel, et al.. (2011). Intentional Communication: Computationally Easy or Difficult?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 5. 52–52. 25 indexed citations
20.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2010). How Action Understanding can be Rational, Bayesian and Tractable. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32). 1643–1648. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026