Countries citing papers authored by Th.P. van der Weide
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Th.P. van der Weide's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Th.P. van der Weide with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Th.P. van der Weide more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Th.P. van der Weide
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Th.P. van der Weide. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Th.P. van der Weide. The network helps show where Th.P. van der Weide may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Th.P. van der Weide
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Th.P. van der Weide.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Th.P. van der Weide based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Th.P. van der Weide. Th.P. van der Weide is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blokpoel, Mark, et al.. (2010). How Action Understanding can be Rational, Bayesian and Tractable. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32). 1643–1648.13 indexed citations
2.
Groot, W.T. de, et al.. (2010). Types and Priorities of Multi-Agent Systems for Empirical Research. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 8. 48–58.1 indexed citations
Bommel, P. van, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Henderik A. Proper, & Th.P. van der Weide. (2007). QoMo: A Modelling Process Quality Framework based on SEQUAL. 121–130.4 indexed citations
7.
Weide, Th.P. van der, P. van Bommel, & Paul de Vrieze. (2006). GAM: A Generic Model for Adaptive Personalisation. CTIT technical report series.1 indexed citations
8.
Bommel, P. van, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Henderik A. Proper, & Th.P. van der Weide. (2006). On the use of Object-Role Modelling to Model Active Domains. 473–484.1 indexed citations
9.
Bommel, P. van, et al.. (2005). Towards and Information Market Paradigm. 27–32.1 indexed citations
10.
Proper, Henderik A., et al.. (2005). Typing and transformational effects in complex information supply. CTIT technical report series.1 indexed citations
11.
Proper, Henderik A. & Th.P. van der Weide. (2005). Modelling as Selection of Interpretation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 223–232.1 indexed citations
12.
Proper, Henderik A., et al.. (2005). IRIS Publication Management System -- the first steps towards realization. Radboud Repository (Radboud University).
13.
Grootjen, F.A. & Th.P. van der Weide. (2005). Conceptual query expansion. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 56(2). 174–193.51 indexed citations
14.
Proper, Henderik A., et al.. (2004). Transformations in Information Supply. 60–78.4 indexed citations
15.
Weide, Th.P. van der, et al.. (2004). Assistance for the domain modeling dialog. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
16.
Arampatzis, Avi, Th.P. van der Weide, C. H. A. Koster, & P. van Bommel. (2000). Term selection for filtering based on distribution of terms over time. 1221–1237.3 indexed citations
Hofstede, Arthur H. M. ter, Henderik A. Proper, & Th.P. van der Weide. (1992). A note on Schema Equivalence. Radboud Repository (Radboud University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.