Daniel C. Dennett

441 total citations
5 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Daniel C. Dennett is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel C. Dennett has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 0 papers in Infectious Diseases, 0 papers in Organic Chemistry and 0 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Daniel C. Dennett's work include . Daniel C. Dennett is often cited by papers focused on . Daniel C. Dennett collaborates with scholars based in . Daniel C. Dennett's co-authors include Deb Roy and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific American, Ethics and Philosophical Topics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel C. Dennett

5 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel C. Dennett	5	111	62	60	41	37	5	246
Keith Gunderson United States	7	51 0.5×	72 1.2×	41 0.7×	28 0.7×	44 1.2×	16	221
Guillermo Del Pinal United States	10	76 0.7×	64 1.0×	41 0.7×	52 1.3×	73 2.0×	20	226
Adrian Cussins United States	5	64 0.6×	58 0.9×	33 0.6×	18 0.4×	30 0.8×	8	182
Gary W. Cantor United States	3	165 1.5×	68 1.1×	60 1.0×	18 0.4×	18 0.5×	3	368
J. A. Scott Kelso	2	172 1.5×	26 0.4×	89 1.5×	24 0.6×	11 0.3×	4	283
Diana Raffman United States	11	140 1.3×	204 3.3×	34 0.6×	21 0.5×	132 3.6×	25	409
Steve Torrance United Kingdom	9	246 2.2×	23 0.4×	107 1.8×	33 0.8×	43 1.2×	21	310
Guido Löhr Netherlands	13	100 0.9×	78 1.3×	42 0.7×	34 0.8×	83 2.2×	27	266
Mitchell S. Green United States	11	112 1.0×	210 3.4×	81 1.4×	60 1.5×	235 6.4×	22	426
Isabel Orenes Spain	10	153 1.4×	133 2.1×	51 0.8×	20 0.5×	48 1.3×	18	375

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Dennett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Dennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Dennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Dennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Dennett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Dennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Dennett. The network helps show where Daniel C. Dennett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel C. Dennett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel C. Dennett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel C. Dennett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel C. Dennett. Daniel C. Dennett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Dennett, Daniel C. & Deb Roy. (2015). Our Transparent Future. Scientific American. 312(3). 64–69. 10 indexed citations

2.

Dennett, Daniel C.. (2010). THE EVOLUTION OF “WHY?”. 58–72. 8 indexed citations

3.

Dennett, Daniel C.. (1996). Kinds Of Minds. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 200 indexed citations

4.

Dennett, Daniel C.. (1994). Get Real. Philosophical Topics. 22(1). 505–568. 11 indexed citations

5.

Dennett, Daniel C.. (1990). The International Stance. Ethics. 100(4). 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact