Diana Raffman
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Flint SchierSergio TenenbaumKathleen Marie HigginsStephen DaviesGeorges ReyRichard ParncuttR. James RobertsRoger Scruton
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Diana Raffman
20 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
- Cognitive Neuroscience 140
- Philosophy 132
- Artificial Intelligence 69
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Raffman
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Raffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Raffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Raffman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Raffman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Raffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Raffman. The network helps show where Diana Raffman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Raffman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Raffman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Raffman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Raffman. Diana Raffman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | RH Logie, Visuo-Spatial Working Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA. FN Dempster & CJ Brainerd, Interference and Inhibition in Cognition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. TC Daddesio, On Minds and Symbols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. R. McClamrock, Existential Cognition. Chicago: Chicago University Press | 3 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 92 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 48 |
About Diana Raffman
Diana Raffman is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Music and Philosophy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations), Philosophy (132 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations). Diana Raffman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Flint Schier, Sergio Tenenbaum, Kathleen Marie Higgins, Stephen Davies, Georges Rey, Richard Parncutt, R. James Roberts, Roger Scruton, Marshall M. Haith and Jerrold Levinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.