Marjolein Berings

436 citations
13 papers · 290 indexed · h-index 8

Marjolein Berings

13 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

Marjolein Berings
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Research and Theory 31
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 42
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 58
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
Replace Signe S Cooper with:
Signe S Cooper United States
Nicola Andrew United Kingdom
Elisabeth Dahlborg Lyckhage Sweden
Jean E. Bartels United States
Mary Anne Andrusyszyn Canada
W. Dean Care Canada
Glenice Ives Australia
Molly Sutphen Norway
Margaret Bowden Australia
Pip Hardy United Kingdom
Marjolein Berings relative to Signe S Cooper United States Signe S Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Signe S Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marjolein Berings

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marjolein Berings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marjolein Berings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marjolein Berings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marjolein Berings

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marjolein Berings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marjolein Berings. The network helps show where Marjolein Berings may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Marjolein Berings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marjolein Berings Line = papers co-authored together Marjolein Berings links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 20243
2 20243
3 20241
4 201652
5 201557
6 200822
7 200834
8 200731
9
On-the-job learning styles: Conceptualization and instrument development for the nursing profession
200619
10 200617
11
Measuring on-the-job learning styles: A critique of three widely used questionnaires
20053
12
What and how do nurses learn on the job?: the development of a classification
20052
13 200546

About Marjolein Berings

Marjolein Berings is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (5 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (4 papers), Higher Education and Employability (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (31 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (42 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations). Marjolein Berings has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Rob F. Poell, P.R.J. Simons, Olle ten Cate, John Gelissen, Marc van Veldhoven, Hester Vermeulen, Hester Vermeulen, Anneke van Vught, Getty Huisman‐de Waal and Ilse Timmerman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026