Margaret Meek
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sarah TannAnderson De
- Topics
- Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers)Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers)Educational Methods and Media Use (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Margaret Meek
16 papers receiving 340 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Literature and Literary Theory 312
- Education 227
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 123
- Sociology and Political Science 101
- Speech and Hearing 98
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Meek
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Meek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Meek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Meek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Meek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Meek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Meek. The network helps show where Margaret Meek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Meek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Meek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Meek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Meek. Margaret Meek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Children's literature and national identity | 34 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | Developing pedagogies in the multilingual classroom : the writings of Josie Levine | 3 |
| 6 | Information & book learning | 7 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | New Readings: Contributions to an Understanding of Literacy | 28 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | On Being Literate | 70 |
| 12 | How Texts Teach What Readers Learn | 210 |
| 13 | Augmentative communication, evolution, and progress for nonspeaking children. | 1 |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | Learning to Read | 46 |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | The Cool Web: The Pattern of Children's Reading | 69 |
About Margaret Meek
Margaret Meek is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Occupational Therapy and Linguistics and Language, having authored 17 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Educational Methods and Media Use (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (312 citations), Speech and Hearing (98 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (123 citations). Margaret Meek has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Tann and Anderson De. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Educational Studies, Theory Into Practice and Cambridge Journal of Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.