Mabel Newcomer

420 citations
17 papers · 208 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Mabel Newcomer

13 papers receiving 127 citations

Peers

Mabel Newcomer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 31
  • Accounting 31
  • Gender Studies 21
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 14
  • History 18
Replace Emil Oberholzer with:
Emil Oberholzer United States
Edwin H. Cady United States
Ernest Kilzer
Edward L. Bernays United States
Alan Hyde Netherlands
Irvin G. Wyllie United States
Harold S. Wechsler United States
Tom Hadden United Kingdom
Byron K. Marshall United States
Frank Thistlethwaite United States
Mabel Newcomer relative to Emil Oberholzer United States Emil Oberholzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Emil Oberholzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mabel Newcomer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mabel Newcomer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mabel Newcomer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mabel Newcomer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mabel Newcomer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mabel Newcomer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mabel Newcomer. The network helps show where Mabel Newcomer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mabel Newcomer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mabel Newcomer Line = papers co-authored together Mabel Newcomer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 196056
2 195642
3 195636
4 195823
5 196113
6 195612
7 19607
8 19554
9
The big business executive, 1964 : a study of his social and educational background
19653
10 19543
11 19532
12 19532
13 19562
14 19592
15 19621
16
Separation of State and Local Revenues in the United States
20090
17 19560

About Mabel Newcomer

Mabel Newcomer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Marketing, having authored 17 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (1 paper), Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (31 citations), Accounting (31 citations), Gender Studies (21 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (14 citations) and History (18 citations). Mabel Newcomer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Edward McKeown, David Harrison, John G. B. Hutchins, W. Lloyd Warner, James C. Abegglen and Allan M. Cartter. Their work appears in journals such as National Tax Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, The Journal of Finance, The Journal of Higher Education and The Business History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact