The Business History Review

1.9k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Business History Review in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Business History Review usually cover Economics and Econometrics (410 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (300 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (281 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (267 papers), American History and Culture (239 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (213 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Business History Review are Alfred D. Chandler, Louis Galambos, Clayton M. Christensen, William Lazonick, Pankaj Ghemawat, Edith Penrose, Richard N. Langlois, Susan Helper, H. Thomas Johnson and Per H. Hansen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Business History Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Business History Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Business History Review.

Countries where authors publish in The Business History Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Business History Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Business History Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Business History Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025