Emil Oberholzer
Impact in
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social and Cultural Dynamics
- Religion and Society Interactions
- Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
- Race, History, and American Society
- Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
- History 4
- Mormonism, Religion, and History 3
- Catholicism and Religious Studies 2
- Co-authors
- E. Digby Baltzell (1 shared paper)Darrett B. Rutman (1 shared paper)Edwin S. Gaustad (1 shared paper)Edmund S. Morgan (1 shared paper)Oscar Handlin (1 shared paper)David E. Stannard (1 shared paper)Clifford K. Shipton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The William and Mary Quarterly (4 papers)American Quarterly (3 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)The Mississippi Valley Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emil Oberholzer
11 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- History 30
- Sociology and Political Science 115
- Political Science and International Relations 57
- Demography 14
- Marketing 11
Countries citing papers authored by Emil Oberholzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Emil Oberholzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emil Oberholzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emil Oberholzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emil Oberholzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emil Oberholzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emil Oberholzer. The network helps show where Emil Oberholzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Emil Oberholzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 152 | |
| 2 | 1967 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1958 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1958 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1956 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1962 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1956 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 1 |
About Emil Oberholzer
Emil Oberholzer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 11 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (3 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (30 citations), Sociology and Political Science (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (57 citations), Demography (14 citations) and Marketing (11 citations). Emil Oberholzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. Digby Baltzell, Darrett B. Rutman, Edwin S. Gaustad, Edmund S. Morgan, Oscar Handlin, David E. Stannard and Clifford K. Shipton. Their work appears in journals such as The William and Mary Quarterly, American Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The Mississippi Valley Historical Review and Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.