Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote
20161.3k citationsWichor M. Bramer, Dean Giustini et al.Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLAprofile →
Peers
Leslie Holland
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
General Health Professions241
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health234
Countries citing papers authored by Leslie Holland
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Leslie Holland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leslie Holland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leslie Holland more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leslie Holland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leslie Holland. The network helps show where Leslie Holland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leslie Holland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leslie Holland.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leslie Holland based on the total number of citations
received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leslie Holland. Leslie Holland is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.