Hazel Squires

1.6k total citations
56 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Hazel Squires is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hazel Squires has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 10 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Hazel Squires's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (24 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers). Hazel Squires is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (24 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (10 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers). Hazel Squires collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Hazel Squires's co-authors include Paul Tappenden, J. Chilcott, Alan Brennan, John Stevens, Katy Cooper, Christopher Carroll, Daniel Hind, Diana Papaioannou, Emma Simpson and RF Logan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, PLoS ONE and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Hazel Squires

51 papers receiving 985 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Hazel Squires 246 197 164 143 129 56 1.0k
Maureen O’Keeffe‐Rosetti 253 1.0× 181 0.9× 157 1.0× 156 1.1× 173 1.3× 46 1.0k
Mark Liebow 216 0.9× 260 1.3× 149 0.9× 229 1.6× 172 1.3× 44 1.5k
Hassan Fouayzi 188 0.8× 181 0.9× 257 1.6× 183 1.3× 138 1.1× 44 1.5k
Gerry Gray 341 1.4× 95 0.5× 142 0.9× 169 1.2× 139 1.1× 9 1.4k
M. Sanni Ali 207 0.8× 138 0.7× 188 1.1× 148 1.0× 193 1.5× 45 1.2k
Gregory W. Daniel 343 1.4× 90 0.5× 161 1.0× 137 1.0× 106 0.8× 46 1.5k
William C. Gerth 413 1.7× 146 0.7× 153 0.9× 127 0.9× 167 1.3× 21 1.4k
Joyce Lii 369 1.5× 154 0.8× 260 1.6× 148 1.0× 163 1.3× 54 1.6k
Jennifer Martin 274 1.1× 293 1.5× 89 0.5× 186 1.3× 141 1.1× 49 1.8k
Haitham Tuffaha 235 1.0× 165 0.8× 172 1.0× 128 0.9× 64 0.5× 78 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Hazel Squires

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hazel Squires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hazel Squires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hazel Squires more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hazel Squires

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hazel Squires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hazel Squires. The network helps show where Hazel Squires may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hazel Squires

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hazel Squires. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hazel Squires based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hazel Squires. Hazel Squires is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Jackson, Sarah E., Hazel Squires, Lion Shahab, et al.. (2024). Associations of Close Social Connections With Smoking and Vaping: A Population Study in England. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 27(3). 447–456.
3.
Squires, Hazel, Michael P. Kelly, Nigel Gilbert, Falko F. Sniehotta, & Robin C. Purshouse. (2023). The long‐term effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of public health interventions; how can we model behavior? A review. Health Economics. 32(12). 2836–2854. 4 indexed citations
4.
Kwon, Joseph, et al.. (2021). Qualitative research to inform economic modelling: a case study in older people’s views on implementing the NICE falls prevention guideline. BMC Health Services Research. 21(1). 1020–1020. 8 indexed citations
5.
Thomas, Chloe, Alan Brennan, Edward Goka, et al.. (2020). What are the cost-savings and health benefits of improving detection and management for six high cardiovascular risk conditions in England? An economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 10(9). e037486–e037486. 12 indexed citations
6.
Bermejo, Iñigo, Hazel Squires, Edith Poku, et al.. (2019). Adalimumab for non-infectious uveitis: is it cost-effective?. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 103(11). 1633–1638. 10 indexed citations
7.
Squires, Hazel, Abdullah Pandor, Praveen Thokala, et al.. (2017). Pertuzumab for the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. PharmacoEconomics. 36(1). 29–38. 17 indexed citations
9.
Squires, Hazel, J. Chilcott, R. Akehurst, Jennifer Burr, & Michael P. Kelly. (2016). A Framework for Developing the Structure of Public Health Economic Models. Value in Health. 19(5). 588–601. 59 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, Chloe, et al.. (2014). Layering Interventions for Type-2 Diabetes Prevention Using The Sphr Diabetes Model. Value in Health. 17(7). A347–A347. 1 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Chloe, et al.. (2014). Validation of the SPHR Diabetes Prevention Model. Value in Health. 17(7). A556–A556. 2 indexed citations
12.
Preston, Louise, et al.. (2014). Modelling the Economics of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prevention: A Literature Review of Methods. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 12(3). 239–253. 18 indexed citations
14.
Blank, Lindsay, et al.. (2012). Systematic review and narrative synthesis of the effectiveness of contraceptive service interventions for young people, delivered in health care settings. Health Education Research. 27(6). 1102–1119. 17 indexed citations
15.
Turner, Rebecca, M Lloyd-Jones, Dilly Anumba, et al.. (2012). Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis in Women Who Are Rh(D) Negative: Meta-Analyses Adjusted for Differences in Study Design and Quality. PLoS ONE. 7(2). e30711–e30711. 47 indexed citations
16.
Tappenden, Paul, Alan Brennan, J. Chilcott, & Hazel Squires. (2011). PCN193 Using Whole Disease Modelling to Inform Economic Recommendations for the Detection, Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up of Colorectal Cancer. Value in Health. 14(7). A469–A470. 2 indexed citations
17.
Tappenden, Paul, Alan Brennan, J. Chilcott, & Hazel Squires. (2011). MO3 A Methodological Framework for Developing Models of Whole Disease Areas to Inform Resource Allocation Decisions. Value in Health. 14(7). A243–A243. 7 indexed citations
18.
Squires, Hazel, Paul Tappenden, Katy Cooper, et al.. (2011). Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin, Celecoxib, and Calcium Chemoprevention for Colorectal Cancer. Clinical Therapeutics. 33(9). 1289–1305. 7 indexed citations
19.
Baxter, Susan, Lindsay Blank, Louise Guillaume, Hazel Squires, & Nick Payne. (2011). Views of contraceptive service delivery to young people in the UK: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 37(2). 71–84. 22 indexed citations
20.
Papaioannou, Diana, Katy Cooper, Christopher Carroll, et al.. (2010). Antioxidants in the chemoprevention of colorectal cancer and colorectal adenomas in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Disease. 13(10). 1085–1099. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026