Journal of Thoracic Oncology

8.1k papers and 194.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.1k papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 194.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (5.7k papers), Oncology (4.3k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4.0k papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2.3k papers) and Lung Cancer Research Studies (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Thoracic Oncology are Jayawant N. Mandrekar, Peter Goldstraw, Valerie W. Rusch, Ramón Rami‐Porta, John Crowley, Dorothy J. Giroux, Kari Chansky, Sai‐Hong Ignatius Ou, Hisao Asamura and William D. Travis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Thoracic Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025