M. J. Schaffer

11.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
166 papers, 4.8k citations indexed

About

M. J. Schaffer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. J. Schaffer has authored 166 papers receiving a total of 4.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 144 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 70 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 61 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. J. Schaffer's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (144 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (67 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (60 papers). M. J. Schaffer is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (144 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (67 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (60 papers). M. J. Schaffer collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. M. J. Schaffer's co-authors include T.E. Evans, R. A. Moyer, A.W. Leonard, J. Ménard, M.E. Fenstermacher, Jong-Kyu Park, K.H. Burrell, G. D. Porter, W.P. West and J.G. Watkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and Chemical Engineering Journal.

In The Last Decade

M. J. Schaffer

161 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Hit Papers

Edge stability and transp... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
M. J. Schaffer 4.5k 2.5k 1.5k 1.4k 1.0k 166 4.8k
C.J. Lasnier 2.7k 0.6× 817 0.3× 1.8k 1.2× 864 0.6× 569 0.6× 148 3.0k
G.L. Jackson 3.8k 0.8× 1.7k 0.7× 1.6k 1.0× 1.4k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 148 4.0k
L. D. Horton 2.6k 0.6× 1.0k 0.4× 1.4k 0.9× 723 0.5× 683 0.7× 104 2.7k
H. Reimerdes 3.7k 0.8× 2.1k 0.8× 1.4k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 837 0.8× 166 3.9k
V. S. Chan 2.4k 0.5× 993 0.4× 1.0k 0.7× 767 0.5× 954 0.9× 186 2.7k
R. Yoshino 1.9k 0.4× 671 0.3× 969 0.6× 791 0.6× 386 0.4× 99 2.0k
C. Kessel 2.0k 0.4× 608 0.2× 1.2k 0.8× 989 0.7× 771 0.8× 144 2.4k
T. C. Hender 4.2k 1.0× 2.7k 1.1× 1.2k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 866 0.8× 122 4.4k
D. Gates 3.1k 0.7× 1.6k 0.6× 985 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 840 0.8× 146 3.2k
G. Saibene 3.7k 0.8× 1.2k 0.5× 2.4k 1.5× 1.3k 0.9× 1.2k 1.2× 202 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Schaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Schaffer. The network helps show where M. J. Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Schaffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Schaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Schaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Schaffer. M. J. Schaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schaffer, M. J., et al.. (2025). Life cycle assessment of a novel hybrid energy storage system: Environmental hotspots and sustainability options based on experimental insights. Journal of Energy Storage. 132. 117705–117705. 2 indexed citations
2.
Schaffer, M. J., et al.. (2023). Bottom-up system modeling of battery storage requirements for integrated renewable energy systems. Applied Energy. 333. 120531–120531. 13 indexed citations
3.
Poli, Nicola, M. J. Schaffer, Andrea Trovò, et al.. (2020). An Electrolyte Rebalancing Procedure for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. ECS Meeting Abstracts. MA2020-02(6). 1033–1033. 1 indexed citations
4.
Strait, E. J., R. J. Buttery, T. A. Casper, et al.. (2014). Measurement of tokamak error fields using plasma response and its applicability to ITER. Nuclear Fusion. 54(7). 73004–73004. 18 indexed citations
5.
Evans, T.E., et al.. (2010). Numerical analysis of resonant magnetic perturbations ELM control in ITER. JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich). 52. 3 indexed citations
6.
Burrell, K.H., T.H. Osborne, M. J. Schaffer, et al.. (2010). Improving Stability and Confinement of Slowly Rotating Tokamak Plasmas Using Static Nonaxisymmetric Magnetic Fields. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 52. 1 indexed citations
7.
Petrie, T.W., T.E. Evans, M.E. Fenstermacher, et al.. (2010). First results examining the compatibility of RMP ELM suppression with the radiating divertor in DIII-D. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 415(1). S906–S909. 4 indexed citations
8.
Cothran, C. D., M. R. Brown, Timothy Gray, M. J. Schaffer, & G.J. Marklin. (2009). Observation of a Helical Self-Organized State in a Compact Toroidal Plasma. Physical Review Letters. 103(21). 215002–215002. 20 indexed citations
9.
Petrie, T.W., N.H. Brooks, M.E. Fenstermacher, et al.. (2009). Sensitivity of injected argon behavior to changes in magnetic balance in double-null plasmas in DIII-D. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 390-391. 242–245. 1 indexed citations
10.
Garofalo, A. M., K.H. Burrell, J. C. DeBoo, et al.. (2008). Observation of Plasma Rotation Driven by Static Nonaxisymmetric Magnetic Fields in a Tokamak. Physical Review Letters. 101(19). 195005–195005. 129 indexed citations
11.
Takahashi, H., E. Fredrickson, & M. J. Schaffer. (2008). Scrape-Off-Layer Current Model for Filament Structure Observed during Edge-Localized Modes in the DIII-D Tokamak. Physical Review Letters. 100(20). 205001–205001. 22 indexed citations
12.
Petrie, T.W., S. L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2005). Variation of particle exhaust with changes in divertor magnetic balance. Nuclear Fusion. 46(1). 57–63. 10 indexed citations
13.
Petrie, T.W., S.L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2004). Variation of Particle Control with Changes in Divertor Geometry. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 58(4). 403–409.
14.
Jackson, G.L., T.E. Evans, R.J. La Haye, et al.. (2003). Overview of RWM Stabilization and Other Experiments With New Internal Coils in the DIII-D Tokamak. APS. 45. 2 indexed citations
15.
Colchin, R. J., M. J. Schaffer, B. A. Carreras, et al.. (2002). SlowLHTransitions in DIII-D Plasmas. Physical Review Letters. 88(25). 255002–255002. 57 indexed citations
16.
Carlstrom, T. N., K. H. Burrell, R. J. Groebner, et al.. (1999). Importance of X-point Physics on the H-mode Power Threshold in DIII-D. APS. 41. 1 indexed citations
17.
Staebler, G. M., G.L. Jackson, W. P. West, et al.. (1997). Energy Confinement Improved with Neon Injection in the DIII--D Tokamak. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 1 indexed citations
18.
Yamaguchi, Satoshi, M. J. Schaffer, & Yasumitsu Kondoh. (1995). Preliminary oscillating fluxes current drive experiment in DIII-D tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design. 26(1-4). 121–132. 4 indexed citations
19.
Carlstrom, T. N., C. K. Chu, T. Ohkawa, et al.. (1986). Reversed-field pinch experiments with a resistive shell. Nuclear Fusion. 26(4). 515–517. 35 indexed citations
20.
Schaffer, M. J.. (1970). Strong stabilizing effect in anisotropic, collisionless, unmagnetized plasmas. Nuclear Fusion. 10(2). 123–130. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026