G. Saibene

10.9k total citations
202 papers, 4.2k citations indexed

About

G. Saibene is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Saibene has authored 202 papers receiving a total of 4.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 171 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 105 papers in Materials Chemistry and 100 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. Saibene's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (171 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (104 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (100 papers). G. Saibene is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (171 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (104 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (100 papers). G. Saibene collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Spain. G. Saibene's co-authors include A. Loarte, F. Sartori, A. Herrmann, M. Bécoulet, G. Federici, T. Eich, V. Parail, M. Henderson, G.F. Matthews and D. Campbell and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

G. Saibene

187 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
G. Saibene 3.7k 2.4k 1.3k 1.2k 1.2k 202 4.2k
J. Stöber 3.7k 1.0× 1.9k 0.8× 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 1.0× 1.5k 1.3× 247 4.3k
A. C. C. Sips 3.2k 0.9× 1.8k 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 915 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 160 3.5k
M.E. Fenstermacher 3.7k 1.0× 1.9k 0.8× 1.1k 0.8× 853 0.7× 1.5k 1.3× 155 4.0k
N. Asakura 3.9k 1.1× 3.0k 1.3× 1.2k 1.0× 898 0.8× 1.2k 1.1× 251 4.6k
J.G. Watkins 3.6k 1.0× 2.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.8× 663 0.6× 1.4k 1.2× 188 4.0k
V. Rozhansky 3.4k 0.9× 2.3k 1.0× 985 0.8× 753 0.6× 1.3k 1.1× 161 3.9k
G.L. Jackson 3.8k 1.0× 1.6k 0.7× 1.4k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 1.7k 1.5× 148 4.0k
W. Fundamenski 4.1k 1.1× 2.8k 1.2× 1.1k 0.8× 682 0.6× 1.4k 1.2× 140 4.3k
R. M. McDermott 4.4k 1.2× 2.0k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 2.3k 2.0× 178 4.7k
C. Giroud 3.5k 0.9× 1.9k 0.8× 984 0.8× 692 0.6× 1.5k 1.3× 211 3.7k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Saibene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Saibene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Saibene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Saibene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Saibene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Saibene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Saibene. The network helps show where G. Saibene may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Saibene

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Saibene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Saibene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Saibene. G. Saibene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kurki-Suonio, T., K. Särkimäki, S. Äkäslompolo, et al.. (2016). Protecting ITER walls: fast ion power loads in 3D magnetic field. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 59(1). 14013–14013. 19 indexed citations
2.
Liu, Yueqiang, S. Äkäslompolo, M. Cavinato, et al.. (2016). Modelling of 3D fields due to ferritic inserts and test blanket modules in toroidal geometry at ITER. Nuclear Fusion. 56(6). 66001–66001. 6 indexed citations
3.
Poli, E., C. Angioni, F. J. Casson, et al.. (2015). On the criteria guiding the design of the upper electron-cyclotron launcher for ITER. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 87. 1008–1008. 2 indexed citations
4.
Luna, E. de la, I.T. Chapman, F. Rimini, et al.. (2015). Understanding the physics of ELM pacing via vertical kicks in JET in view of ITER. Nuclear Fusion. 56(2). 26001–26001. 31 indexed citations
5.
Aiello, G., A. Vaccaro, Didier Combescure, et al.. (2014). The ITER EC H&CD Upper Launcher: Seismic analysis. Fusion Engineering and Design. 89(7-8). 1809–1813. 13 indexed citations
6.
Evans, T.E., D.M. Orlov, A. Wingen, et al.. (2013). 3D vacuum magnetic field modelling of the ITER ELM control coil during standard operating scenarios. Nuclear Fusion. 53(9). 93029–93029. 64 indexed citations
7.
Nunes, I., P. Lomas, D. C. McDonald, et al.. (2013). Confinement and edge studies towards lowρ*andν*at JET. Nuclear Fusion. 53(7). 73020–73020. 9 indexed citations
8.
Schmitz, O., M. Bécoulet, P. Cahyna, et al.. (2013). Modeling of divertor particle and heat loads during application of resonant magnetic perturbation fields for ELM control in ITER. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 438. S194–S198. 21 indexed citations
9.
Orlov, D.M., A. Wingen, A. Loarte, et al.. (2012). 3D Vacuum Magnetic Field Modeling of the ITER ELM Control Coils During Standard Operating Scenarios. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 54. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ciattaglia, S., P. Barabaschi, S. Chiocchio, et al.. (2009). ITER operating limit definition criteria. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(12). 2059–2063. 6 indexed citations
11.
Albanese, R., G. Ambrosino, M. Ariola, et al.. (2009). ITER vertical stabilization system. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(2-6). 394–397. 11 indexed citations
12.
Barrera, L., L. Figini, A. Alfier, et al.. (2007). Measur ements of inboar d-outboar d asymmetr y of pedestal temper atur e collapse dur ing Type I ELMs in J ET..
13.
Loarte, A., G. Saibene, F. Sartori, et al.. (2005). Influence of toroidal field direction and plasma rotation on pedestal and ELM characteristics in JET ELMy H-modes. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1 indexed citations
14.
Loarte, A., G. Saibene, F. Sartori, et al.. (2005). A new look at JET operation with Be as plasma facing material. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 337-339. 816–820. 20 indexed citations
15.
Kallenbach, A., Y. Andrew, M. Beurskens, et al.. (2004). EDGE2D modelling of edge profiles obtained in JET diagnostic optimized configuration. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 46(3). 431–446. 60 indexed citations
16.
Sartori, F., G. Saibene, L. D. Horton, et al.. (2004). Study of Type III ELMs in JET. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 46(5). 723–750. 58 indexed citations
17.
Andrew, Y., M. Beurskens, M. de Baar, et al.. (2002). Local edge parameters at the L-H transition on JET. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 44. 1 indexed citations
18.
Chankin, A. & G. Saibene. (1999). Interpretation of density limits and the H-mode operational diagram through similarity parameters for edge transport mechanisms. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 41(7). 913–930. 22 indexed citations
19.
Lowry, C.G., D. Campbell, P. Carman, et al.. (1992). Results of JET operation with continuous carbon and beryllium X-point target plates. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 196-198. 735–738. 3 indexed citations
20.
Saibene, G., F. Sartori, P. Andrew, et al.. (1992). Tritium accounting during the first tritium experiment at JET. Fusion Engineering and Design. 19(2). 133–147. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026