N. S. Wolf

612 citations
30 papers · 277 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

N. S. Wolf

27 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

N. S. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 228
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 106
  • Materials Chemistry 117
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
  • Biomedical Engineering 64
Replace N. C. Hawkes with:
N. C. Hawkes United Kingdom
H. Weisen Switzerland
M. R. Dunstan United Kingdom
I. Coffey United Kingdom
S. C. Bates United States
K. C. Lee United States
G. Mazzitelli Italy
J. Kim United States
H. Tojo Japan
G. Naylor United Kingdom
N. S. Wolf relative to N. C. Hawkes United Kingdom N. C. Hawkes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
N. C. Hawkes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. S. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. S. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. S. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. S. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. S. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. S. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. S. Wolf. The network helps show where N. S. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. S. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. S. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together N. S. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200339
2 200134
3 198028
4 199524
5 200524
6 200518
7 199016
8 199613
9 198313
10 20059
11 19856
12 20036
13 20055
14 20045
15 19825
16 19865
17 20015
18 19994
19 19903
20
CORRELATION OF H-MODE BARRIER WIDTH AND NEUTRAL PENETRATION LENGTH
20023

About N. S. Wolf

N. S. Wolf is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (24 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (12 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (11 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (7 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (4 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers) and Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (228 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (106 citations), Materials Chemistry (117 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (58 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (64 citations). N. S. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include R. McWilliams, G. D. Porter, A.W. Leonard, M. A. Mahdavi, T.H. Osborne, L.W. Owen, R. J. Groebner, P.C. Stangeby, C. S. Liu and V. K. Tripathi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physical Review Letters, Fusion Science & Technology, Physics Letters A and Nuclear Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact