G.L. Jackson
Impact in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Fusion materials and technologies
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 187
-
- Fusion materials and technologies 7
- Co-authors
- E. J. Strait (36 shared papers)R.J. La Haye (34 shared papers)H. Reimerdes (25 shared papers)Andrea M. Garofalo (27 shared papers)Michael J. Schaffer (21 shared papers)Tiffany Luce (22 shared papers)Matthew J. Lanctot (17 shared papers)T. S. Taylor (15 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nuclear Fusion (53 papers)Journal of Nuclear Materials (28 papers)Physics of Plasmas (27 papers)Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (22 papers)Physical Review Letters (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G.L. Jackson
203 papers receiving 7.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 6.7k
- Materials Chemistry 356
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 28
- Biomedical Engineering 29
- Control and Systems Engineering 17
Countries citing papers authored by G.L. Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of G.L. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.L. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.L. Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G.L. Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.L. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.L. Jackson. The network helps show where G.L. Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.L. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 207 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 254 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 199 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 181 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 166 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 148 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 145 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 139 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 128 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 125 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 115 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 115 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 114 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 113 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 113 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 110 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 103 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 98 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 97 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 95 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 91 |
About G.L. Jackson
G.L. Jackson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 207 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (187 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (7 papers) and Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.7k citations), Materials Chemistry (356 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (28 citations), Biomedical Engineering (29 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (17 citations). G.L. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. J. Strait, R.J. La Haye, H. Reimerdes, Andrea M. Garofalo, Michael J. Schaffer, Tiffany Luce, Matthew J. Lanctot, T. S. Taylor, M. S. Chu and M. Okabayashi. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Physics of Plasmas, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.