T.W. Petrie

4.2k total citations
106 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

T.W. Petrie is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, T.W. Petrie has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 90 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 61 papers in Materials Chemistry and 36 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in T.W. Petrie's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (90 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (61 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (35 papers). T.W. Petrie is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (90 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (61 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (35 papers). T.W. Petrie collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. T.W. Petrie's co-authors include A.W. Leonard, C.J. Lasnier, M.E. Fenstermacher, M. A. Mahdavi, J.G. Watkins, D. N. Hill, R. J. Groebner, R. Maingi, W.P. West and A.W. Hyatt and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

T.W. Petrie

102 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
T.W. Petrie United States 25 1.7k 1.3k 630 438 335 106 1.9k
V.A. Chuyanov Germany 16 605 0.4× 779 0.6× 250 0.4× 192 0.4× 343 1.0× 51 1.2k
C. Lowry United Kingdom 17 859 0.5× 751 0.6× 263 0.4× 172 0.4× 334 1.0× 45 1.1k
N. Yan China 18 692 0.4× 466 0.4× 318 0.5× 278 0.6× 238 0.7× 99 1.1k
F. Nguyen France 17 751 0.4× 280 0.2× 183 0.3× 323 0.7× 232 0.7× 50 895
S. Wukitch United States 20 898 0.5× 344 0.3× 247 0.4× 406 0.9× 342 1.0× 63 975
М. Тендлер Sweden 12 537 0.3× 218 0.2× 121 0.2× 315 0.7× 79 0.2× 59 642
Y. Liu China 15 859 0.5× 324 0.3× 211 0.3× 453 1.0× 252 0.8× 55 1.0k
D. Stork United Kingdom 16 681 0.4× 491 0.4× 194 0.3× 157 0.4× 345 1.0× 41 862
Travis Gray United States 16 676 0.4× 517 0.4× 196 0.3× 167 0.4× 227 0.7× 54 832
S. Potzel Germany 20 1.4k 0.8× 1.1k 0.8× 397 0.6× 348 0.8× 266 0.8× 52 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by T.W. Petrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.W. Petrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.W. Petrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.W. Petrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.W. Petrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.W. Petrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.W. Petrie. The network helps show where T.W. Petrie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of T.W. Petrie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T.W. Petrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T.W. Petrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with T.W. Petrie. T.W. Petrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Eldon, D., Egemen Kolemen, David Humphreys, et al.. (2019). Advances in radiated power control at DIII-D. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 18. 285–290. 24 indexed citations
2.
Buttery, R. J., Brent Covele, J.R. Ferron, et al.. (2018). DIII-D Research to Prepare for Steady State Advanced Tokamak Power Plants. Journal of Fusion Energy. 38(1). 72–111. 34 indexed citations
3.
Unterberg, E.A., D. M. Thomas, T.W. Petrie, et al.. (2016). Overview of the DIII-D Divertor Tungsten Rings Campaign. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016. 1 indexed citations
4.
Leonard, A.W., et al.. (2011). An Isolated Divertor for Reactor Scale Tokamaks. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 53. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kallenbach, A., M. Balden, R. Dux, et al.. (2010). Plasma surface interactions in impurity seeded plasmas. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 415(1). S19–S26. 108 indexed citations
6.
Jackson, G.L., T. A. Casper, T. C. Luce, et al.. (2009). Simulating ITER plasma startup and rampdown scenarios in the DIII-D tokamak. Nuclear Fusion. 49(11). 115027–115027. 24 indexed citations
7.
Petrie, T.W., N.H. Brooks, M.E. Fenstermacher, et al.. (2009). Sensitivity of injected argon behavior to changes in magnetic balance in double-null plasmas in DIII-D. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 390-391. 242–245. 1 indexed citations
8.
Garofalo, A. M., T.W. Petrie, M. R. Wade, et al.. (2008). Fusion Development Facility Divertor Design. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 50. 1 indexed citations
9.
Ferron, J. R., T.C. Luce, T.W. Petrie, et al.. (2008). Studies in DIII-D of High Beta Discharge Scenarios Appropriate for Steady-state Tokamak Operation With Burning Plasmas. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 50. 1 indexed citations
10.
Petrie, T.W., et al.. (2007). An Exploration of Wall Retrofit Best Practices. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2024. 8154006–8154006. 8 indexed citations
11.
Petrie, T.W., S. L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2005). Variation of particle exhaust with changes in divertor magnetic balance. Nuclear Fusion. 46(1). 57–63. 10 indexed citations
12.
Petrie, T.W., S.L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2004). Variation of Particle Control with Changes in Divertor Geometry. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 58(4). 403–409.
13.
Fenstermacher, M.E., A.W. Leonard, G. D. Porter, et al.. (2004). Effect of B-field dependent particle drifts on ELM behavior in the DIII-D boundary plasma. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 337-339. 781–785. 1 indexed citations
14.
Petrie, T.W., et al.. (2002). THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC BALANCE ON THE POLOIDAL DISTRIBUTION OF ELM-INDUCED PEAK PARTICLE FLUX AT THE DIVERTOR TARGETS IN DIII-D. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 4 indexed citations
15.
Rensink, M.E., C.J. Lasnier, T.W. Petrie, G. D. Porter, & T.D. Rognlien. (2002). Simulation of Edge Plasmas in DIII-D Double-Null Configurations. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 42(2-4). 181–186. 1 indexed citations
16.
Osborne, T.H., M. A. Mahdavi, M.E. Fenstermacher, et al.. (2001). Gas puff fueled H-mode discharges with good energy confinement above the Greenwald density limit on DIII-D. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 290-293. 1013–1017. 19 indexed citations
17.
Jackson, G.L., G. M. Staebler, D. R. Baker, et al.. (1998). Impurity Seeding and Radiating Mantle Discharges in the DIII--D Tokamak. APS. 1 indexed citations
18.
Lasnier, C.J., D. N. Hill, T.W. Petrie, et al.. (1998). Survey of target plate heat flux in diverted DIII-D tokamak discharges. Nuclear Fusion. 38(8). 1225–1249. 59 indexed citations
19.
Leonard, A.W., T.W. Petrie, & S. L. Allen. (1995). Radiation distributions in detached divertor operation on DIII-D. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 2(7). 396–396.
20.
Klepper, C. C., J. Hogan, P.K. Mioduszewski, et al.. (1992). Comparison of transient and stationary neutral pressure response in the DIII-D advanced divertor. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 196-198. 1090–1095. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026