M.E. Rensink

2.3k total citations
70 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

M.E. Rensink is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M.E. Rensink has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 49 papers in Materials Chemistry and 22 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in M.E. Rensink's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (64 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (49 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (22 papers). M.E. Rensink is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (64 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (49 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (22 papers). M.E. Rensink collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. M.E. Rensink's co-authors include T.D. Rognlien, G. D. Porter, D. N. Hill, A.W. Leonard, M. A. Mahdavi, A.H. Futch, D.P. Stotler, N. Asakura, H. Takenaga and S.L. Allen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Physics of Plasmas.

In The Last Decade

M.E. Rensink

67 papers receiving 979 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.E. Rensink United States 20 941 780 312 224 174 70 1.0k
K. Borraß Germany 13 1.0k 1.1× 832 1.1× 281 0.9× 228 1.0× 226 1.3× 48 1.1k
H.D. Pacher Canada 19 933 1.0× 826 1.1× 315 1.0× 134 0.6× 195 1.1× 49 1.0k
S. Devaux Germany 21 830 0.9× 671 0.9× 226 0.7× 153 0.7× 176 1.0× 50 951
Yu. Igitkhanov Germany 17 877 0.9× 733 0.9× 256 0.8× 244 1.1× 194 1.1× 96 1.1k
J.G. Watkins United States 16 966 1.0× 558 0.7× 230 0.7× 461 2.1× 157 0.9× 46 1.1k
C.J. Lasnier United States 22 1.1k 1.1× 623 0.8× 335 1.1× 391 1.7× 214 1.2× 65 1.1k
D. Harting Germany 20 1.0k 1.1× 736 0.9× 322 1.0× 307 1.4× 251 1.4× 70 1.1k
N. Hosogane Japan 18 901 1.0× 669 0.9× 382 1.2× 209 0.9× 193 1.1× 74 982
D.K. Mansfield United States 17 929 1.0× 719 0.9× 234 0.8× 209 0.9× 249 1.4× 36 1.1k
T.C. Jernigan United States 20 979 1.0× 608 0.8× 304 1.0× 246 1.1× 278 1.6× 32 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by M.E. Rensink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.E. Rensink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.E. Rensink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.E. Rensink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.E. Rensink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.E. Rensink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.E. Rensink. The network helps show where M.E. Rensink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.E. Rensink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.E. Rensink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.E. Rensink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.E. Rensink. M.E. Rensink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
LaBombard, B., M. Umansky, A.Q. Kuang, et al.. (2019). Performance assessment of long-legged tightly-baffled divertor geometries in the ARC reactor concept. Nuclear Fusion. 59(10). 106052–106052. 17 indexed citations
2.
Rognlien, T.D., et al.. (2019). Simulations of a high-density, highly-radiating lithium divertor. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 18. 233–238. 10 indexed citations
3.
LaBombard, B., M. Umansky, A.Q. Kuang, et al.. (2018). UEDGE modelling of detached divertor operation for long‐leg divertor geometries in ARC. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 58(6-8). 791–797. 4 indexed citations
4.
Umansky, M., M.E. Rensink, T.D. Rognlien, et al.. (2017). Assessment of X-point target divertor configuration for power handling and detachment front control. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 12. 918–923. 14 indexed citations
5.
Izacard, Olivier, F. Scotti, V. Soukhanovskii, et al.. (2016). UEDGE modeling of snowflake divertors in NSTX-U. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rognlien, T.D., I. Joseph, A.G. McLean, et al.. (2015). Modeling Detached Divertor Plasma Characteristics in the DIII-D Tokamak. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2015.
7.
Rensink, M.E., M. Groth, G. D. Porter, et al.. (2007). Simulation of main-chamber recycling in DIII-D with the UEDGE code. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 363-365. 816–821. 8 indexed citations
8.
Petrie, T.W., S. L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2005). Variation of particle exhaust with changes in divertor magnetic balance. Nuclear Fusion. 46(1). 57–63. 10 indexed citations
9.
Petrie, T.W., S.L. Allen, N.H. Brooks, et al.. (2004). Variation of Particle Control with Changes in Divertor Geometry. Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 58(4). 403–409.
10.
Rensink, M.E., C.J. Lasnier, T.W. Petrie, G. D. Porter, & T.D. Rognlien. (2002). Simulation of Edge Plasmas in DIII-D Double-Null Configurations. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 42(2-4). 181–186. 1 indexed citations
11.
Schaffer, M. J., S. Lippmann, M. A. Mahdavi, et al.. (2002). Particle control in the DIII-D advanced divertor. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1990. 197–200. 1 indexed citations
12.
Moir, R.W., R.H. Bulmer, K. Gulec, et al.. (2001). Thick Liquid-Walled, Field-Reversed Configuration-Magnetic Fusion Power Plant. Fusion Technology. 39(2P2). 758–767. 6 indexed citations
13.
Rensink, M.E., L.L. LoDestro, G. D. Porter, T.D. Rognlien, & D. Coster. (1998). A Comparison of Neutral Gas Models for Divertor Plasmas. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 38(1-2). 325–330. 26 indexed citations
14.
Rensink, M.E., L.L. LoDestro, G. D. Porter, T.D. Rognlien, & D. Coster. (1997). Comparison of Fluid and Monte Carlo Neutral Gas Models in Divertor Plasma Simulations. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 1 indexed citations
15.
Porter, G. D., S.L. Allen, M. D. Brown, et al.. (1996). Simulation of experimentally achieved DIII-D detached plasmas using the U E D G E code. Physics of Plasmas. 3(5). 1967–1975. 43 indexed citations
16.
Rensink, M.E., Bastiaan J. Braams, & J.N. Brooks. (1995). TPX divertor modeling studies. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 22. 481–8. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hill, D. N., M.E. Rensink, A.H. Futch, et al.. (1990). Measurement and modeling of the DIII-D divertor plasma. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 176-177. 158–164. 21 indexed citations
18.
Allen, S.L., et al.. (1989). Recycling and neutral transport in the DIII-D tokamak. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 162-164. 80–92. 26 indexed citations
19.
Cohen, R. H., et al.. (1984). Plasma transport caused by ion/neutral atom collisions I. Slab model. Nuclear Fusion. 24(10). 1251–1267. 6 indexed citations
20.
Berk, H. L., D.L. Correll, C. Gormezano, & M.E. Rensink. (1978). Plasma energy confinement in conventional mirrors with externally heated electrons. Nuclear Fusion. 18(10). 1379–1388. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026