Lynn Vos

11 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Lynn Vos
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 68
  • Computer Science Applications 28
  • Education 122
  • Accounting 42
Replace Dallas Brozik with:
Dallas Brozik United States
Nathan A. Heller United States
Steven F. Tello United States
Paul Wells New Zealand
Nicola Beatson New Zealand
Bhavani Sridharan Australia
Chi Cheng Chang Taiwan
Elmarie Papageorgiou South Africa
Narumon Sriratanaviriyakul Vietnam
Keith T. Jones United States
Lynn Vos relative to Dallas Brozik United States Dallas Brozik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Dallas Brozik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynn Vos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn Vos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn Vos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn Vos. The network helps show where Lynn Vos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Lynn Vos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynn Vos Line = papers co-authored together Lynn Vos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201068
2 201566
3 201332
4 201920
5 201815
6 200815
7 201014
8 201413
9 20136
10
Student experiences of the use of a marketing simulation game
20084
11
( HOW MUCH DO SIMULATION GAMES IMPROVE MARKETING STUDENTS' NUMERACY AND FINANCIAL SKILLS?)
20121

About Lynn Vos

Lynn Vos is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Marketing Education (8 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (6 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (3 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper) and Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (84 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (68 citations), Computer Science Applications (28 citations), Education (122 citations) and Accounting (42 citations). Lynn Vos has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ross Brennan, Stephen J. Page, Kate Armstrong and Paul Baines. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Management Education, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Journal of Marketing Education, Marketing Intelligence & Planning and Journal of Teaching in International Business.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact