Luís Heredia

39 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Luís Heredia
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Developmental Neuroscience 59
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 41
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 136
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 120
Replace Sivan Vadakkadath Meethal with:
Sivan Vadakkadath Meethal United States
Scott E. Parnell United States
Jutatip Guptarak United States
Miki Nakanishi Japan
Lubov Nathanson United States
Shameena Bake United States
Ana Rita Álvaro Portugal
Somayeh Niknazar Iran
Laura Latini Italy
Kristin H. Horn United States
Luís Heredia relative to Sivan Vadakkadath Meethal United States Sivan Vadakkadath Meethal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sivan Vadakkadath Meethal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luís Heredia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luís Heredia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luís Heredia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luís Heredia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luís Heredia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luís Heredia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luís Heredia. The network helps show where Luís Heredia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luís Heredia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luís Heredia Line = papers co-authored together Luís Heredia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006153
2 201470
3 201652
4 201751
5 201643
6 201341
7 201134
8 200524
9 201222
10 201318
11 201117
12 201116
13 201516
14 201515
15 201213
16 201313
17 201213
18 201111
19 201310
20 20139

About Luís Heredia

Luís Heredia is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (5 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (59 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (41 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (136 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (120 citations). Luís Heredia has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente, María Teresa Colomina, Tom Meagher, Richard J. Hughes, Matthias Staufenbiel, José de Olmos, Jorge Busciglio, Soledad de Olmos and Pablo Helguera. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Toxicology, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Food and Chemical Toxicology and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact