Paul J. Locher
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Co-authors
- Calvin F. NodineElizabeth A. KrupinskiKees OverbeekePieter Jan StappersLisa F. SmithJohan WagemansClaudia Mello‐ThomsJeffrey K. Smith
- Topics
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (27 papers)Color perception and design (21 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Paul J. Locher
56 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 842
- Social Psychology 703
- Sensory Systems 332
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 232
Countries citing papers authored by Paul J. Locher
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul J. Locher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul J. Locher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul J. Locher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul J. Locher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul J. Locher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul J. Locher. The network helps show where Paul J. Locher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul J. Locher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul J. Locher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul J. Locher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul J. Locher. Paul J. Locher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | The usefulness of eye movement recordings to subject an aesthetic episode with visual art to empirical scrutiny. | 43 |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | 105 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About Paul J. Locher
Paul J. Locher is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (27 papers), Color perception and design (21 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Sensory Systems (332 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (842 citations). Paul J. Locher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Calvin F. Nodine, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Kees Overbeeke, Pieter Jan Stappers, Lisa F. Smith, Johan Wagemans, Claudia Mello‐Thoms, Jeffrey K. Smith, Debra A. Zellner and Stephan Wensveen. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Sex Roles.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.