Linda Lacey

22 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Linda Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Health Professions 148
  • Research and Theory 74
  • Economics and Econometrics 72
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 55
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 49
Replace Bret Lyman with:
Bret Lyman United States
Linda Boos Canada
Kim Tolley United Kingdom
Neil W. Hamilton United States
Michelle M. Fleig-Palmer United States
Roopa Dhatt United States
Özgün Ünal Türkiye
Bruce Wood United Kingdom
Halvard Vike Norway
Peter Kragh Jespersen Denmark
Linda Lacey relative to Bret Lyman United States Bret Lyman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Bret Lyman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Lacey. The network helps show where Linda Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda Lacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda Lacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda Lacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Linda Lacey. Linda Lacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
South Carolina health professions data book
5
2 3
3
Validating HRSA's nurse supply and demand models: a state-level perspective.
11
4 10
5 24
6 100
7 25
8 8
9 2
10
Do Female-Headed Households Have Different Shelter Needs than Men? The Case of Monrovia, Liberia
6
11 1
12 7
13 14
14
Using a community cancer treatment trials network for cancer prevention and control research: challenges and opportunities.
10
15 8
16
Performance in quasi-firms: an example from the Community Clinical Oncology Program.
4
17
Low-income settlements in Monrovia Liberia.
0
18 10
19 3
20 7

About Linda Lacey

Linda Lacey is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Urban Studies and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 24 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (74 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 citations) and Leadership and Management (10 citations). Linda Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include David R. Godschalk, Jennifer Nooney, Richard B. Warnecke, J Morrissey, Edward J. Sondik, A D Kaluzny, Arnold D. Kaluzny, Denise M. Hynes, Irit Sinaï and Howard Ozer. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Cancer Research and International Migration Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026