Irit Sinaï

1.2k total citations
45 papers, 753 citations indexed

About

Irit Sinaï is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Irit Sinaï has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 753 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 19 papers in General Health Professions and 16 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Irit Sinaï's work include Global Maternal and Child Health (24 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (13 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (12 papers). Irit Sinaï is often cited by papers focused on Global Maternal and Child Health (24 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (13 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (12 papers). Irit Sinaï collaborates with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Peru. Irit Sinaï's co-authors include Victoria Jennings, Marcos Arévalo, Rebecka Lundgren, Olugbenga Oguntunde, Elizabeth Omoluabi, Marguerite Duane, Michael D. Manhart, April Lind, Jennifer Anyanti and Federico R. León and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Fertility and Sterility and Urban Studies.

In The Last Decade

Irit Sinaï

44 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Irit Sinaï United States 14 386 309 267 183 96 45 753
Heidi Bart Johnston Switzerland 12 514 1.3× 558 1.8× 221 0.8× 108 0.6× 210 2.2× 24 816
Elizabeth Omoluabi United States 16 450 1.2× 336 1.1× 333 1.2× 28 0.2× 60 0.6× 49 657
Lori S. Ashford 12 713 1.8× 373 1.2× 592 2.2× 40 0.2× 97 1.0× 16 1.0k
Leigh Senderowicz United States 13 486 1.3× 449 1.5× 269 1.0× 103 0.6× 137 1.4× 42 697
Vladimíra Kantorová United States 10 561 1.5× 307 1.0× 394 1.5× 16 0.1× 72 0.8× 20 905
Karin Ringheim United States 18 245 0.6× 173 0.6× 338 1.3× 49 0.3× 13 0.1× 30 670
Joyce Mumah Kenya 14 410 1.1× 166 0.5× 453 1.7× 16 0.1× 39 0.4× 26 674
Meghan Corroon United States 14 487 1.3× 221 0.7× 396 1.5× 19 0.1× 30 0.3× 19 613
T.K. Sundari Ravindran India 13 234 0.6× 182 0.6× 207 0.8× 10 0.1× 84 0.9× 54 607
Victoria Jennings United States 15 351 0.9× 389 1.3× 254 1.0× 252 1.4× 100 1.0× 41 730

Countries citing papers authored by Irit Sinaï

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irit Sinaï's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irit Sinaï with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irit Sinaï more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irit Sinaï

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irit Sinaï. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irit Sinaï. The network helps show where Irit Sinaï may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irit Sinaï

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irit Sinaï. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irit Sinaï based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irit Sinaï. Irit Sinaï is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sinaï, Irit, et al.. (2024). Role of men in women’s health service utilisation in northern Nigeria: a qualitative study of women, men and provider perspectives. BMJ Open. 14(8). e085758–e085758. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sinaï, Irit, et al.. (2022). Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 20(1). 24–24. 7 indexed citations
3.
Oguntunde, Olugbenga, et al.. (2021). Factors associated with the knowledge of obstetric danger signs, and perceptions of the need for obstetric care amongst married young women in northern Nigeria. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 13(1). e1–e9. 7 indexed citations
4.
Kalibala, Samuel, Irit Sinaï, & Tara Nutley. (2021). Documenting HIV research-utilization activities, outputs and outcomes: examples and lessons learned from Project SOAR. Archives of Public Health. 79(1). 99–99. 1 indexed citations
6.
Oguntunde, Olugbenga, et al.. (2018). Overcoming barriers to access and utilization of maternal, newborn and child health services in northern Nigeria: an evaluation of facility health committees. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 104–104. 13 indexed citations
8.
Sinaï, Irit, et al.. (2018). Programmatic implications of unmet need for contraception among men and young married women in northern Nigeria. PubMed. Volume 9. 81–90. 12 indexed citations
9.
10.
Sinaï, Irit, et al.. (2017). Demand for Women’s Health Services in Northern Nigeria: A Review of the Literature. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 21(2). 96–108. 41 indexed citations
11.
Kalibala, Samuel, Godfrey Woelk, Stephen Gloyd, et al.. (2016). Experiences in implementation and publication of operations research interventions: gaps and a way forward. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 19(5S4). 20842–20842. 1 indexed citations
12.
Arévalo, Marcos, et al.. (2010). Adding the Standard Days Method® to the contraceptive method mix in a high-prevalence setting in Peru. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 28(2). 80–85. 7 indexed citations
13.
Sinaï, Irit, Rebecka Lundgren, Marcos Arévalo, & Victoria Jennings. (2006). Fertility Awareness–Based Methods of Family Planning: Predictors of Correct Use. International Family Planning Perspectives. 32(2). 94–100. 9 indexed citations
14.
Sinaï, Irit, Victoria Jennings, & Marcos Arévalo. (2004). The importance of screening and monitoring: the Standard Days Method and cycle regularity. Contraception. 69(3). 201–206. 11 indexed citations
15.
Arévalo, Marcos, et al.. (2004). Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning. Fertility and Sterility. 82(4). 885–892. 57 indexed citations
16.
Arévalo, Marcos, Victoria Jennings, & Irit Sinaï. (2003). Application of simple fertility awareness–based methods of family planning to breastfeeding women. Fertility and Sterility. 80(5). 1241–1248. 14 indexed citations
17.
Arévalo, Marcos, Victoria Jennings, & Irit Sinaï. (2002). Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method. Contraception. 65(5). 333–338. 105 indexed citations
18.
Sinaï, Irit, Victoria Jennings, & Marcos Arévalo. (1999). The twoday algorithm: a new algorithm to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception. 60(2). 65–70. 27 indexed citations
19.
Arévalo, Marcos, Irit Sinaï, & Victoria Jennings. (1999). A fixed formula to define the fertile window of the menstrual cycle as the basis of a simple method of natural family planning. Contraception. 60(6). 357–360. 51 indexed citations
20.
Lacey, Linda & Irit Sinaï. (1996). Do Female-Headed Households Have Different Shelter Needs than Men? The Case of Monrovia, Liberia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 27(1). 89–108. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026