Lily Cushenbery

519 total citations
10 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

Lily Cushenbery is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lily Cushenbery has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lily Cushenbery's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Lily Cushenbery is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Lily Cushenbery collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Lily Cushenbery's co-authors include Samuel T. Hunter, Paul Gill, John Horgan, Melissa B. Gutworth, Allison S. Gabriel, Mona Shah and Jenna B. Shapiro and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Organizational Behavior, Journal of Business and Psychology and The Journal of Creative Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Lily Cushenbery

8 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lily Cushenbery United States	6	119	114	101	77	61	10	330
Sheng‐Tsung Hou Taiwan	6	92 0.8×	75 0.7×	148 1.5×	50 0.6×	51 0.8×	20	322
Jay J. Caughron United States	8	68 0.6×	108 0.9×	177 1.8×	63 0.8×	78 1.3×	9	389
Hsueh-Liang Fan Taiwan	6	133 1.1×	113 1.0×	176 1.7×	41 0.5×	76 1.2×	11	394
Shyhnan Liou Taiwan	11	108 0.9×	99 0.9×	57 0.6×	53 0.7×	39 0.6×	39	363
Lars Ryhammar Sweden	6	189 1.6×	78 0.7×	126 1.2×	34 0.4×	89 1.5×	9	375
Fan Zhou China	7	51 0.4×	99 0.9×	85 0.8×	66 0.9×	30 0.5×	12	248
Patricia A. Rowe Australia	7	96 0.8×	81 0.7×	109 1.1×	56 0.7×	54 0.9×	24	321
Jan Francis‐Smythe United Kingdom	10	60 0.5×	78 0.7×	108 1.1×	51 0.7×	30 0.5×	27	327
Karyn Dossinger United States	6	143 1.2×	87 0.8×	69 0.7×	46 0.6×	19 0.3×	11	269
Kylie Rochford United States	10	47 0.4×	106 0.9×	96 1.0×	47 0.6×	44 0.7×	19	341

Countries citing papers authored by Lily Cushenbery

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lily Cushenbery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lily Cushenbery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lily Cushenbery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lily Cushenbery

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lily Cushenbery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lily Cushenbery. The network helps show where Lily Cushenbery may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lily Cushenbery

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lily Cushenbery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lily Cushenbery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lily Cushenbery. Lily Cushenbery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Hunter, Samuel T., et al.. (2017). Why dual leaders will drive innovation: Resolving the exploration and exploitation dilemma with a conservation of resources solution. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 38(8). 1183–1195. 73 indexed citations

Gutworth, Melissa B., Lily Cushenbery, & Samuel T. Hunter. (2016). Creativity for Deliberate Harm: Malevolent Creativity and Social Information Processing Theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 52(4). 305–322. 44 indexed citations

Cushenbery, Lily & Allison S. Gabriel. (2014). Reappraising the Brain Drain: Collaboration as a Catalyst for Innovation in Industrial–Organizational Research. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 7(3). 347–351.

Cushenbery, Lily, et al.. (2014). Being Right or Being Sorry: Leader Responses to Task and Relationship Mistakes. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014(1). 12678–12678. 1 indexed citations

Hunter, Samuel T. & Lily Cushenbery. (2014). Is Being a Jerk Necessary for Originality? Examining the Role of Disagreeableness in the Sharing and Utilization of Original Ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology. 30(4). 621–639. 29 indexed citations

Cushenbery, Lily, et al.. (2014). Recovery From Public And Private Mistakes:Apology Reduces Leader Avoidance Of Followers. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014(1). 17460–17460. 1 indexed citations

Hunter, Samuel T., et al.. (2014). Leadership, innovation, and technology: The evolution of the creative process. 81–110.

Gill, Paul, John Horgan, Samuel T. Hunter, & Lily Cushenbery. (2013). Malevolent Creativity in Terrorist Organizations. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 47(2). 125–151. 83 indexed citations

Hunter, Samuel T., et al.. (2012). Partnerships in Leading for Innovation: A Dyadic Model of Collective Leadership. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 5(4). 424–428. 20 indexed citations

10.

Hunter, Samuel T. & Lily Cushenbery. (2011). Leading for Innovation. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 13(3). 248–265. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact