Lewis Dean
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Studies top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rachel L. KendalKevin N. LalandSteven J. SchapiroBernard ThierryEmma FlynnEmily BurdettGillian L. ValeAndrew Whiten
- Topics
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers)Language and cultural evolution (5 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesBiological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Lewis Dean
11 papers receiving 658 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Social Psychology 385
- Cultural Studies 346
- Sociology and Political Science 316
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 203
- Developmental Biology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Lewis Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Lewis Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lewis Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lewis Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lewis Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lewis Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lewis Dean. The network helps show where Lewis Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lewis Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lewis Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lewis Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lewis Dean. Lewis Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 226 | |
| 8 | Identification of the Social and Cognitive Processes Underlying Human Cumulative Culturebreakdown → | 319 |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 18 |
About Lewis Dean
Lewis Dean is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Developmental Biology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers), Language and cultural evolution (5 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (346 citations), Developmental Biology (88 citations) and Social Psychology (385 citations). Lewis Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Rachel L. Kendal, Kevin N. Laland, Steven J. Schapiro, Bernard Thierry, Emma Flynn, Emily Burdett, Gillian L. Vale, Andrew Whiten, Nicola McGuigan and G. Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.