Leigh Arden Ford
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Austin S. BabrowChris R. KaschAndrew F. BennettSandi W. SmithCynthia StohlBeth Hartman EllisGust A. YepRobbin D. Crabtree
- Topics
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Leigh Arden Ford
17 papers receiving 501 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Sociology and Political Science 138
- General Health Professions 133
- Social Psychology 111
- Clinical Psychology 87
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
Countries citing papers authored by Leigh Arden Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Leigh Arden Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leigh Arden Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leigh Arden Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leigh Arden Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leigh Arden Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leigh Arden Ford. The network helps show where Leigh Arden Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leigh Arden Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leigh Arden Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leigh Arden Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leigh Arden Ford. Leigh Arden Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | Communication Activism: Vol. 1, Communication for Social Change | 11 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 216 | |
| 11 | 89 | |
| 12 | 69 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | The role of context certainty and value in the communication of social support: An analysis of breast cancer patients' support messages | 1 |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | A Bormannean Fantasy Theme Analysis of “The Big Book" of Alcoholics Anonymous | 1 |
About Leigh Arden Ford
Leigh Arden Ford is a scholar working on Philosophy, Communication and Ecological Modeling, having authored 17 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (30 citations), Applied Psychology (46 citations) and Communication (47 citations). Leigh Arden Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Austin S. Babrow, Chris R. Kasch, Andrew F. Bennett, Sandi W. Smith, Cynthia Stohl, Beth Hartman Ellis, Gust A. Yep, Robbin D. Crabtree, Jenifer E. Kopfman and Kelly Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as American Behavioral Scientist, Communication Monographs and Health Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.