Annie Potts
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicola GaveyTiina VaresVictoria M. GraceDonna HarawayLeonore TieferPhilip ArmstrongAnn Weatherall
- Topics
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (8 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Annie Potts
25 papers receiving 922 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Clinical Psychology 389
- Gender Studies 385
- Sociology and Political Science 316
- Psychiatry and Mental health 275
- Social Psychology 223
Countries citing papers authored by Annie Potts
This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Potts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Potts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Potts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Potts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Potts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Potts. The network helps show where Annie Potts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annie Potts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annie Potts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annie Potts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annie Potts. Annie Potts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Framing Possums: War, sport and patriotism in depictions of brushtail possums in New Zealand print media | 9 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | A New Zealand book of beasts : animals in our culture, history and everyday life | 19 |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 90 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 99 | |
| 14 | 74 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | The Science/Fiction of Sex: Feminist Deconstruction and the Vocabularies of Heterosex | 111 |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 111 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Annie Potts
Annie Potts is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, General Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (9 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (8 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (385 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (112 citations) and Clinical Psychology (389 citations). Annie Potts has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Gavey, Tiina Vares, Victoria M. Grace, Donna Haraway, Leonore Tiefer, Philip Armstrong and Ann Weatherall. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Sociology of Health & Illness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.