Laurel Brehm

791 total citations
32 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

Laurel Brehm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Laurel Brehm has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 9 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Laurel Brehm's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (24 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (7 papers). Laurel Brehm is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (24 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (7 papers). Laurel Brehm collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Laurel Brehm's co-authors include Phillip M. Alday, Darren Tanner, Janet Nicol, Kathryn Bock, Antje S. Meyer, Carrie N. Jackson, Katie Wagner, Enriqueta Canseco-Gonzalez, Cameron Brick and Sarah Brown‐Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Laurel Brehm

28 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Laurel Brehm Netherlands 11 330 245 115 91 89 32 439
Tamar Degani Israel 14 347 1.1× 394 1.6× 115 1.0× 82 0.9× 98 1.1× 33 537
Benjamin Swets United States 8 445 1.3× 354 1.4× 203 1.8× 123 1.4× 192 2.2× 11 605
Arild Hestvik United States 13 299 0.9× 258 1.1× 166 1.4× 71 0.8× 186 2.1× 35 502
Wing-Yee Chow United Kingdom 11 309 0.9× 210 0.9× 122 1.1× 71 0.8× 59 0.7× 19 375
Stephani Foraker United States 7 415 1.3× 320 1.3× 162 1.4× 180 2.0× 156 1.8× 8 581
Winston D. Goh Singapore 13 335 1.0× 230 0.9× 201 1.7× 84 0.9× 20 0.2× 30 465
Clinton L. Johns United States 10 360 1.1× 368 1.5× 115 1.0× 68 0.7× 52 0.6× 15 509
Aine Ito United Kingdom 11 459 1.4× 324 1.3× 221 1.9× 109 1.2× 61 0.7× 17 510
Wind Cowles United States 9 130 0.4× 114 0.5× 126 1.1× 52 0.6× 67 0.8× 13 259
Pauli Brattico Finland 11 136 0.4× 61 0.2× 89 0.8× 117 1.3× 163 1.8× 38 318

Countries citing papers authored by Laurel Brehm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurel Brehm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurel Brehm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurel Brehm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurel Brehm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurel Brehm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurel Brehm. The network helps show where Laurel Brehm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laurel Brehm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laurel Brehm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laurel Brehm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laurel Brehm. Laurel Brehm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2025). When is a ranana a banana? Disentangling the mechanisms of error repair and word learning. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 40(5). 696–716.
2.
Todd, Simon, et al.. (2025). Evaluating LLMs as proxies for humans in psycholinguistic ratings: A comparison of statistical knowledge. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. 4(3). 100274–100274.
3.
Tooley, Kristen M. & Laurel Brehm. (2025). Putting the prime in priming: Using prime processing behavior to predict target structural processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 32(4). 1599–1610. 1 indexed citations
4.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2024). How do GenZ speakers use and process emoji in chatbot conversations: An eye-tracking study. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America. 9(1). 5653–5653.
5.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2023). Effects of irrelevant unintelligible and intelligible background speech on spoken language production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 77(8). 1745–1769.
6.
Brehm, Laurel & Phillip M. Alday. (2022). Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language. 125. 104334–104334. 80 indexed citations
7.
Brehm, Laurel & Antje S. Meyer. (2021). Planning when to say: Dissociating cue use in utterance initiation using cross-validation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(9). 1772–1799. 4 indexed citations
8.
Meyer, Antje S., et al.. (2021). Concurrent listening affects speech planning and fluency: the roles of representational similarity and capacity limitation. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 36(10). 1258–1280. 4 indexed citations
9.
Brehm, Laurel & Phillip M. Alday. (2020). A decade of mixed models: It’s past time to set your contrasts. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 3 indexed citations
10.
Meyer, Antje S., et al.. (2019). Slow naming of pictures facilitates memory for their names. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(5). 1675–1682. 4 indexed citations
11.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2019). Mental representations of partner task cause interference in picture naming. Acta Psychologica. 199. 102888–102888. 5 indexed citations
12.
Meyer, Antje S., Ardi Roelofs, & Laurel Brehm. (2019). Thirty years ofSpeaking: An introduction to the Special Issue. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 34(9). 1073–1084. 5 indexed citations
13.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2019). How long can you hold the filler: maintenance and retrieval. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 35(1). 17–42. 11 indexed citations
14.
Brehm, Laurel, Carrie N. Jackson, & Karen Miller. (2018). Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(4). 764–778. 17 indexed citations
15.
Brehm, Laurel, et al.. (2018). The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming. Memory. 27(3). 340–352. 24 indexed citations
16.
Brehm, Laurel & Matthew Goldrick. (2017). Distinguishing discrete and gradient category structure in language: Insights from verb-particle constructions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 43(10). 1537–1556. 8 indexed citations
17.
Brehm, Laurel & Kathryn Bock. (2016). Referential and lexical forces in number agreement. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 32(2). 129–146. 9 indexed citations
18.
Tanner, Darren, Janet Nicol, & Laurel Brehm. (2014). The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. Journal of Memory and Language. 76. 195–215. 96 indexed citations
19.
Brehm, Laurel. (2014). Speed limits and red flags: Why number agreement accidents happen. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 1 indexed citations
20.
Brehm, Laurel & Kathryn Bock. (2013). What counts in grammatical number agreement?. Cognition. 128(2). 149–169. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026