Phillip M. Alday
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Ina Bornkessel‐SchlesewskyMatthias SchlesewskyLaurel BrehmAndrew W. CorcoranJona SassenhagenAntje S. MeyerHans Rutger BoskerAndrea E. Martin
- Topics
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Phillip M. Alday
32 papers receiving 690 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Cognitive Neuroscience 535
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 198
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 185
- Social Psychology 83
- Artificial Intelligence 77
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip M. Alday
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip M. Alday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip M. Alday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip M. Alday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip M. Alday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip M. Alday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip M. Alday. The network helps show where Phillip M. Alday may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip M. Alday
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip M. Alday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip M. Alday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip M. Alday. Phillip M. Alday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 126 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 44 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Phillip M. Alday
Phillip M. Alday is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 34 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (535 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (198 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (185 citations). Phillip M. Alday has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, Matthias Schlesewsky, Laurel Brehm, Andrew W. Corcoran, Jona Sassenhagen, Antje S. Meyer, Hans Rutger Bosker, Andrea E. Martin, Stefan Bode and Daniel Feuerriegel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Psychological Review and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.