Lalin Anik

644 total citations
16 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Lalin Anik is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Lalin Anik has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Lalin Anik's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers). Lalin Anik is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers). Lalin Anik collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Türkiye. Lalin Anik's co-authors include Michael I. Norton, Ceren Hayran, Lara B. Aknin, Elizabeth W. Dunn, Dan Ariely, Zeynep Gürhan‐Canlı, Jordi Quoidbach, Luca Cian, Tami Kim and Muhammad Akhyar and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Marketing Research and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Lalin Anik

15 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Lalin Anik
Rod Duclos United States
Daniella Kupor United States
Dalia L. Diab United States
Julian Jake Zlatev United States
Rebecca Schaumberg United States
Rod Duclos United States
Lalin Anik
Citations per year, relative to Lalin Anik Lalin Anik (= 1×) peers Rod Duclos

Countries citing papers authored by Lalin Anik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lalin Anik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lalin Anik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lalin Anik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lalin Anik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lalin Anik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lalin Anik. The network helps show where Lalin Anik may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lalin Anik

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lalin Anik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lalin Anik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lalin Anik. Lalin Anik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
2.
Kim, Tami, Lalin Anik, & Luca Cian. (2021). Feedback as a two-way street: when and why rating consumers fails. Marketing Letters. 32(4). 351–362. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hayran, Ceren & Lalin Anik. (2021). Well-Being and Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) on Digital Content in the Time of COVID-19: A Correlational Analysis among University Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(4). 1974–1974. 79 indexed citations
4.
Hayran, Ceren, Lalin Anik, & Zeynep Gürhan‐Canlı. (2020). A threat to loyalty: Fear of missing out (FOMO) leads to reluctance to repeat current experiences. PLoS ONE. 15(4). e0232318–e0232318. 54 indexed citations
5.
Anik, Lalin, et al.. (2019). One of a kind: The strong and complex preference for unique treatment from romantic partners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 86. 103899–103899. 2 indexed citations
6.
Anik, Lalin & Michael I. Norton. (2019). On Being the Tipping Point: Social Threshold Incentives Motivate Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Anik, Lalin, et al.. (2019). Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder. Marketing Letters. 30(1). 27–43. 23 indexed citations
8.
Anik, Lalin & Michael I. Norton. (2019). On Being the Tipping Point: Social Threshold Incentives Motivate Behavior. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 5(1). 19–33. 9 indexed citations
9.
Anik, Lalin, et al.. (2017). Globalgiving. SSRN Electronic Journal.
10.
Anik, Lalin, et al.. (2017). A General Theory of Coolness. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
11.
Anik, Lalin & Michael I. Norton. (2014). Matchmaking Promotes Happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 5(6). 644–652. 6 indexed citations
12.
Anik, Lalin, Michael I. Norton, & Dan Ariely. (2014). Contingent Match Incentives Increase Donations. Journal of Marketing Research. 51(6). 790–801. 41 indexed citations
13.
Anik, Lalin, Lara B. Aknin, Michael I. Norton, Elizabeth W. Dunn, & Jordi Quoidbach. (2013). Prosocial Bonuses Increase Employee Satisfaction and Team Performance. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e75509–e75509. 69 indexed citations
14.
Anik, Lalin & Michael I. Norton. (2012). iPhones for friends, refrigerators for family: How products prime social networks. Social Influence. 7(3). 154–171. 1 indexed citations
15.
Norton, Michael I., Lalin Anik, Lara B. Aknin, & Elizabeth W. Dunn. (2011). Is Life Nasty, Brutish, and Short? Philosophies of Life and Well-Being. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2(6). 570–575. 10 indexed citations
16.
Anik, Lalin, Lara B. Aknin, Michael I. Norton, & Elizabeth W. Dunn. (2009). Feeling Good About Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026