Kim C. Steiner

2.9k total citations
93 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Kim C. Steiner is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim C. Steiner has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 42 papers in Plant Science and 36 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Kim C. Steiner's work include Forest ecology and management (36 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (30 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (18 papers). Kim C. Steiner is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (36 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (30 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (18 papers). Kim C. Steiner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Kim C. Steiner's co-authors include Thomas E. Kolb, Songlin Fei, J. M. Skelly, Larry H. McCormick, Todd S. Fredericksen, Roger T. Koide, Ian A. Dickie, Todd W. Bowersox, Frederick V. Hebard and Marc D. Abrams and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Pollution, Ecological Monographs and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Kim C. Steiner

89 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim C. Steiner United States 27 1.1k 1.1k 1.0k 487 414 93 2.2k
Isabella Børja Norway 19 638 0.6× 627 0.6× 590 0.6× 314 0.6× 420 1.0× 47 1.5k
Jonàs Oliva Sweden 24 930 0.8× 628 0.6× 718 0.7× 540 1.1× 470 1.1× 76 1.9k
G. Geoff Wang United States 25 590 0.5× 810 0.7× 894 0.9× 236 0.5× 372 0.9× 81 1.7k
Jesús Rodríguez‐Calcerrada Spain 29 957 0.8× 942 0.9× 1.4k 1.4× 679 1.4× 314 0.8× 90 2.1k
J. Bradley St. Clair United States 27 553 0.5× 1.1k 1.0× 850 0.8× 323 0.7× 530 1.3× 49 2.1k
Kurt W. Gottschalk United States 25 500 0.4× 893 0.8× 701 0.7× 94 0.2× 750 1.8× 85 1.8k
Ale× Mosseler Canada 24 525 0.5× 728 0.7× 580 0.6× 154 0.3× 345 0.8× 69 1.7k
Paul D. Manion United States 13 428 0.4× 584 0.5× 539 0.5× 233 0.5× 434 1.0× 41 1.3k
Bartolomeo Schirone Italy 29 611 0.5× 865 0.8× 722 0.7× 613 1.3× 370 0.9× 68 2.2k
Steven E. McKeand United States 30 843 0.7× 1.6k 1.5× 871 0.8× 198 0.4× 256 0.6× 122 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Kim C. Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim C. Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim C. Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim C. Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim C. Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim C. Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim C. Steiner. The network helps show where Kim C. Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim C. Steiner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim C. Steiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim C. Steiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim C. Steiner. Kim C. Steiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steiner, Kim C.. (2017). Genetic Differences in Resistance of Scotch Pine to Eastern Pineshoot Borer. The Great Lakes Entomologist. 7(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Zhang, Jianwei, Marcus Schaub, J.A. Ferdinand, et al.. (2010). Leaf age affects the responses of foliar injury and gas exchange to tropospheric ozone in Prunus serotina seedlings. Environmental Pollution. 158(8). 2627–2634. 19 indexed citations
3.
Fei, Songlin & Kim C. Steiner. (2007). Evidence for Increasing Red Maple Abundance in the Eastern United States. Forest Science. 53(4). 473–477. 104 indexed citations
4.
Fei, Songlin, Peter J. Gould, Kim C. Steiner, James C. Finley, & Marc E. McDill. (2005). Forest regeneration composition and development in upland, mixed-oak forests. Tree Physiology. 25(12). 1495–1500. 13 indexed citations
5.
McWilliams, William H., Todd W. Bowersox, Patrick H. Brose, et al.. (2004). Indicators of regenerative capacity for eastern hardwood forests. 1 indexed citations
6.
Steiner, Kim C., et al.. (2002). Heritability of Ozone Sensitivity in Open-Pollinated Families of Black Cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). Forest Science. 48(1). 111–117. 10 indexed citations
7.
Steiner, Kim C., et al.. (2002). Heritability of ozone sensitivity in open-pollinated families of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). Forest Science. 48(1). 111–117. 17 indexed citations
8.
Skelly, J. M., et al.. (2000). Foliar injury, leaf gas exchange and biomass responses of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) half-sibling families to ozone exposure. Environmental Pollution. 107(1). 117–126. 19 indexed citations
9.
Lee, Jae‐Hyung, et al.. (1999). Foliar response of black cherry (Prunus serotina) clones to ambient ozone exposure in central Pennsylvania. Environmental Pollution. 105(3). 325–331. 21 indexed citations
10.
Fredericksen, Todd S., et al.. (1996). Size-mediated foliar response to ozone in black cherry trees. Environmental Pollution. 91(1). 53–63. 48 indexed citations
11.
Fredericksen, Todd S., et al.. (1995). Physiology, morphology, and ozone uptake of leaves of black cherry seedlings, saplings, and canopy trees. Environmental Pollution. 89(3). 273–283. 68 indexed citations
12.
Steiner, Kim C., Marc D. Abrams, & Todd W. Bowersox. (1993). Advance reproduction and other stand characteristics in Pennsylvania and French stands of northern red oak. 161. 10 indexed citations
13.
Zaczek, James J., Kim C. Steiner, & Charles W. Heuser. (1993). Vegetative propagation of mature and juvenile northern red oak. 161. 4 indexed citations
14.
Kolb, Thomas E., Kim C. Steiner, Larry H. McCormick, & Todd W. Bowersox. (1990). Growth response of northern red-oak and yellow-poplar seedlings to light, soil moisture and nutrients in relation to ecological strategy. Forest Ecology and Management. 38(1-2). 65–78. 116 indexed citations
15.
Kolb, Thomas E. & Kim C. Steiner. (1990). Growth and Biomass Partitioning Response of Northern Red Oak Genotypes to Shading and Grass Root Competition. Forest Science. 36(2). 293–303. 31 indexed citations
16.
Abrams, Marc D., Mark E. Kubiske, & Kim C. Steiner. (1990). Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.: photosynthesis, water relations and leaf morphology. Tree Physiology. 6(3). 305–315. 86 indexed citations
17.
Steiner, Kim C. & Todd W. Bowersox. (1987). Setting Educational Objectives for Forestry Curricula. Journal of Forestry. 85(12). 38–40. 1 indexed citations
18.
DeWald, Laura E. & Kim C. Steiner. (1986). Phenology, height increment, and cold tolerance of Alnus glutinosa populations in a common environment. Silvae genetica. 35. 205–211. 20 indexed citations
19.
Steiner, Kim C., et al.. (1984). Response of populus hybrids to aluminium toxicity. Forest Science. 30(2). 404–410. 18 indexed citations
20.
Berrang, Paul & Kim C. Steiner. (1980). Resistance of Pin Oak Progenies to Iron Chlorosis1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 105(4). 519–522. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026