Michael E. Ostry

1.8k total citations
90 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Michael E. Ostry is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology and Endocrinology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael E. Ostry has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Plant Science, 34 papers in Ecology and 30 papers in Endocrinology. Recurrent topics in Michael E. Ostry's work include Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (30 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (29 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (24 papers). Michael E. Ostry is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (30 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (29 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (24 papers). Michael E. Ostry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Michael E. Ostry's co-authors include Keith Woeste, Neil A. Anderson, G. Laflamme, Steven Katovich, Robert C. Venette, Brian J. Palik, Paula M. Pijut, Amy L. Ross‐Davis, Charles H. Michler and Glenn R. Furnier and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Biomass and Bioenergy and Plant Science.

In The Last Decade

Michael E. Ostry

86 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael E. Ostry United States 19 538 351 325 266 252 90 1.1k
Mark T. Windham United States 19 763 1.4× 251 0.7× 277 0.9× 312 1.2× 369 1.5× 90 1.3k
Luisa Ghelardini Italy 18 476 0.9× 362 1.0× 117 0.4× 163 0.6× 304 1.2× 48 870
Kirk Broders United States 21 1.1k 2.1× 265 0.8× 146 0.4× 230 0.9× 748 3.0× 64 1.4k
Brian W. Geils United States 17 496 0.9× 239 0.7× 80 0.2× 277 1.0× 96 0.4× 48 883
Claude Husson France 21 872 1.6× 539 1.5× 149 0.5× 377 1.4× 654 2.6× 44 1.4k
M. Hubbes Canada 23 639 1.2× 471 1.3× 142 0.4× 341 1.3× 466 1.8× 83 1.2k
D. R. Bergdahl United States 11 385 0.7× 603 1.7× 93 0.3× 76 0.3× 250 1.0× 36 966
Mitchell M. Sewell United States 18 603 1.1× 104 0.3× 41 0.1× 412 1.5× 153 0.6× 23 1.2k
Johan Fogelqvist Sweden 20 672 1.2× 80 0.2× 140 0.4× 230 0.9× 90 0.4× 22 961
Igor Yakovlev Norway 23 1.0k 1.9× 172 0.5× 33 0.1× 908 3.4× 89 0.4× 44 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Ostry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Ostry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Ostry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Ostry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Ostry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Ostry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Ostry. The network helps show where Michael E. Ostry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael E. Ostry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael E. Ostry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael E. Ostry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael E. Ostry. Michael E. Ostry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Katovich, Steven & Michael E. Ostry. (2018). Insects Associated With Butternut and Butternut Canker in Minnesota and Wisconsin. The Great Lakes Entomologist. 31(2). 3 indexed citations
3.
Ostry, Michael E., et al.. (2015). Estimating heritability of disease resistance and factors that contribute to long-term survival in butternut (Juglans cinerea L.). Tree Genetics & Genomes. 11(3). 14 indexed citations
4.
Beklová, Miroslava, et al.. (2009). Ecotoxicity evaluation in municipal and food industry wastewaters.. Fresenius environmental bulletin. 18. 1674–1680. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ross‐Davis, Amy L., Zi‐Gang Huang, James McKenna, Michael E. Ostry, & Keith Woeste. (2008). Morphological and molecular methods to identify butternut (Juglans cinerea) and butternut hybrids: relevance to butternut conservation. Tree Physiology. 28(7). 1127–1133. 36 indexed citations
6.
Ostry, Michael E., et al.. (2007). Natural and Experimental Host Range of Sirococcus clavigignenti-juglandacearum. Plant Disease. 91(5). 581–584. 16 indexed citations
7.
Michler, Charles H., Paula M. Pijut, Douglass F. Jacobs, et al.. (2006). Improving disease resistance of butternut (Juglans cinerea), a threatened fine hardwood: a case for single-tree selection through genetic improvement and deployment. Tree Physiology. 26(1). 121–128. 31 indexed citations
8.
Srivastava, Kamna, Michael E. Ostry, & Sunil Kumar. (2005). Efficacy of ArmicarbTM 100 Against Sirococcus clavaganti – Juglandacearum (A Butternut Canker Pathogen). Indian Journal of Forestry. 28(2). 162–163.
9.
Kasanen, Risto, Jarkko Hantula, Michael E. Ostry, Jean Pinon, & Timo Kurkela. (2004). North American populations of Entoleuca mammata are genetically more variable than populations in Europe. Mycological Research. 108(7). 766–774. 9 indexed citations
10.
Ostry, Michael E. & Keith Woeste. (2004). SPREAD OF BUTTERNUT CANKER IN NORTH AMERICA, HOST RANGE, EVIDENCE OF RESISTANCE WITHIN BUTTERNUT POPULATIONS AND CONSERVATION GENETICS. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 243. 27 indexed citations
11.
Furnier, Glenn R., et al.. (1999). Genetic evidence that butternut canker was recently introduced into North America. Canadian Journal of Botany. 77(6). 783–785. 36 indexed citations
12.
Pijut, Paula M., et al.. (1997). Micropropagation of juvenile and mature american beech. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC). 51(3). 209–213. 16 indexed citations
13.
Ostry, Michael E., et al.. (1994). Poplar disease research: host resistance and pathogen variability. Orvosi Hetilap. 18(37). 89–6. 6 indexed citations
14.
Bucciarelli, Bruna, Michael E. Ostry, Nickolas Anderson, & Carroll P. Vance. (1993). Activity of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase, O-Methyl Transferase and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Populus Tremuloides Resistant and Susceptible to Hypoxylon Mammatum. Phytopathology. 83(12). 1 indexed citations
15.
Ostry, Michael E. & Neil A. Anderson. (1990). Disease resistance in a wild system:hypoxylon canker of aspen. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 237. 3 indexed citations
16.
Ostry, Michael E., et al.. (1988). A guide to insect, disease, and animal pests of poplars. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 36 indexed citations
17.
Ostry, Michael E. & Neil A. Anderson. (1986). Infection of Aspen by Hypoxylon-Mammatum Through Treehopper Wounds. Phytopathology. 76(9). 1 indexed citations
18.
Ostry, Michael E. & Neil A. Anderson. (1983). Infection of trembling aspen by Hypoxylon mammatum through cicada oviposition wounds. Phytopathology. 73(7). 1095. 9 indexed citations
19.
Wilson, Louis F., et al.. (1982). A split-stem lesion on young hybrid Populus trees caused by the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera (Heteroptera): Miridae).. The Great Lakes Entomologist. 15(4). 237–246. 3 indexed citations
20.
Ostry, Michael E. & Neil A. Anderson. (1979). Infection of Populus tremuloides by Hypoxylon mammatum at oviposition sites of cicadas (Magicicada septendecim) (L.).. Phytopathology. 69(9). 1041–1041. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026