James S. Rentch
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Ray R. HicksJames T. AndersonMary Ann FajvanThomas M. SchulerRonald H. FortneyKurt W. GottschalkJ. J. ColbertJingxin Wang
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (19 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaFrance
In The Last Decade
James S. Rentch
42 papers receiving 959 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Global and Planetary Change 568
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 534
- Ecology 434
- Atmospheric Science 214
- Plant Science 156
Countries citing papers authored by James S. Rentch
This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Rentch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Rentch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Rentch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Rentch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Rentch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Rentch. The network helps show where James S. Rentch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Rentch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Rentch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Rentch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Rentch. James S. Rentch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Proceedings, 18th Central Hardwood Forest Conference | 11 |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | Stand development of trembling aspen in Canaan Valley, West Virginia | 1 |
| 15 | 101 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | Post Logging Era Plant Successional Trends and Geospatial Vegetation Patterns in Canaan Valley, West Virginia, 1945 to 2000 | 15 |
| 20 | An Ecological Study of a Carolina Hemlock (Tsuga caroliniana) Community in Southwestern Virginia | 9 |
About James S. Rentch
James S. Rentch is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (19 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (534 citations), Global and Planetary Change (568 citations) and Ecology (434 citations). James S. Rentch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Ray R. Hicks, James T. Anderson, Mary Ann Fajvan, Thomas M. Schuler, Ronald H. Fortney, Kurt W. Gottschalk, J. J. Colbert, Jingxin Wang, Pengsen Sun and Zhen Yu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Forest Ecology and Management and Environmental Research Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.