Wind Goodfriend
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Amanda B. DiekmanChristopher R. AgnewXimena B. ArriagaNicole M. CapezzaMeara M. HabashiAnn E. HooverAmber L. GarciaKevin C. Taylor
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Wind Goodfriend
19 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Sociology and Political Science 268
- Social Psychology 256
- Gender Studies 211
- Clinical Psychology 93
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Wind Goodfriend
This map shows the geographic impact of Wind Goodfriend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wind Goodfriend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wind Goodfriend more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wind Goodfriend
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wind Goodfriend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wind Goodfriend. The network helps show where Wind Goodfriend may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wind Goodfriend
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wind Goodfriend. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wind Goodfriend based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wind Goodfriend. Wind Goodfriend is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | She asked for it: statistics and predictors of rape myth acceptance | 3 |
| 9 | Long distance vs proximal romantic relationships: Predicting commitment, investments, and bias | 2 |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | Comfort food: obesity and mood influences on food uptake | 2 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 99 | |
| 17 | 155 | |
| 18 | 96 | |
| 19 | 20 |
About Wind Goodfriend
Wind Goodfriend is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 559 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (211 citations), Social Psychology (256 citations) and Applied Psychology (42 citations). Wind Goodfriend has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Amanda B. Diekman, Christopher R. Agnew, Ximena B. Arriaga, Nicole M. Capezza, Meara M. Habashi, Ann E. Hoover, Amber L. Garcia, Kevin C. Taylor and Alicia H. Nordstrom. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.