Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson

7.0k citations
112 papers · 5.0k indexed · h-index 40

Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson

108 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 2.8k
  • Health 777
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 124
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 617
Replace Charles E. Holzer with:
Charles E. Holzer United States
Elmar Bräehler Germany
Donald S. Rae United States
Ruth Parslow Australia
J. Ormel Netherlands
Daniel L. Segal United States
Corey S. Mackenzie Canada
RC Kessler United States
Edwin de Beurs Netherlands
Christian Hakulinen Finland
Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson relative to Charles E. Holzer United States Charles E. Holzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles E. Holzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. The network helps show where Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 201727
4 201276
5 20117
6 201055
7 201014
8 20096
9 2009113
10 200954
11 200934
12 200917
13 200715
14 2007118
15 200645
16 200624
17 200532
18 2004130
19 2004164
20 199013

About Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson

Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (15 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (11 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations), Health (777 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (124 citations). Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Joiner, Dan G. Blazer, E. Ashby Plant, Julia Sheffler, Edelyn Verona, Annya Hernandez, Kathleen Kendall–Tackett, Ian H. Stanley, Jesse R. Cougle and Christina J. Riccardi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026