Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Health top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Thomas E. JoinerDan G. BlazerE. Ashby PlantJulia ShefflerEdelyn VeronaAnnya HernandezKathleen Kendall–TackettIan H. Stanley
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
108 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Clinical Psychology 2.8k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
- General Health Professions 803
- Health 777
- Social Psychology 714
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. The network helps show where Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson. Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 76 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 113 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 118 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 130 | |
| 19 | 164 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson
Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 112 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (19 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations), Health (777 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (124 citations). Natalie Sachs‐Ericsson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Joiner, Dan G. Blazer, E. Ashby Plant, Julia Sheffler, Edelyn Verona, Annya Hernandez, Kathleen Kendall–Tackett, Ian H. Stanley, Jesse R. Cougle and Christina J. Riccardi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.