Kim Schoemaker

924 citations
15 papers · 681 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Schoemaker

14 papers receiving 654 citations

Peers

Kim Schoemaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Clinical Psychology 417
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 293
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
Replace Emma A. Climie with:
Emma A. Climie Canada
Sébastien Normand Canada
Maria Rogers Canada
Brendan F. Andrade Canada
Jeffrey R. Gagne United States
Laura Backen Jones United States
Kristen A. King United States
Raymond H. Baillargeon Canada
Angela D. Staples United States
Jenelle Nissley‐Tsiopinis United States
Kim Schoemaker relative to Emma A. Climie Canada Emma A. Climie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Emma A. Climie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Schoemaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Schoemaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Schoemaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Schoemaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Schoemaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Schoemaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Schoemaker. The network helps show where Kim Schoemaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kim Schoemaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Schoemaker Line = papers co-authored together Kim Schoemaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012268
2 2011159
3 201553
4 201744
5 201437
6 201530
7 201423
8 201721
9 201315
10 201612
11 20138
12 20157
13 20172
14
Vechtscheidende ouders – Wie zijn dat?
20151
15 20211

About Kim Schoemaker

Kim Schoemaker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (417 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (293 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (128 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations). Kim Schoemaker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Walter Matthys, Maja Deković, Hanna Mulder, Tessa Bunte, Kimberly Andrews Espy, Sandra A. Wiebe, Catrin Finkenauer, David J. Hessen, P.G.M. van der Heijden and J.C. de Schipper. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Developmental Neuropsychology, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact