Margreet Visser
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- F. Lamers-WinkelmanCatrin FinkenauerAgnes M. WillemenReine C. van der WalJ.C. de SchipperEsther S. KluwerKim SchoemakerVikash Reddy
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthDemographyClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUkraineUnited States
In The Last Decade
Margreet Visser
18 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Clinical Psychology 137
- Sociology and Political Science 107
- Demography 87
- Health 69
- Social Psychology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Margreet Visser
This map shows the geographic impact of Margreet Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margreet Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margreet Visser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margreet Visser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margreet Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margreet Visser. The network helps show where Margreet Visser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margreet Visser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margreet Visser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margreet Visser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margreet Visser. Margreet Visser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | Vechtscheidingen : Beleving en ervaringen van ouders en kinderen en verandering na Kinderen uit de Knel | 1 |
| 10 | Skills supply and demand in South Africa | 25 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | Vechtscheidende ouders – Wie zijn dat? | 1 |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | Impact assessment of learnerships and apprenticeships | 1 |
About Margreet Visser
Margreet Visser is a scholar working on Demography, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (8 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (69 citations), Demography (87 citations) and Clinical Psychology (137 citations). Margreet Visser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Ukraine and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. Lamers-Winkelman, Catrin Finkenauer, Agnes M. Willemen, Reine C. van der Wal, J.C. de Schipper, Esther S. Kluwer, Kim Schoemaker, Vikash Reddy, F. Arends and Haroon Bhorat. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, BMC Psychiatry and Journal of Family Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.