Kim E. van Oorschot

33 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Kim E. van Oorschot
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Strategy and Management 350
  • Management Science and Operations Research 223
  • Management Information Systems 200
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 117
  • Economics and Econometrics 69
Replace George Westerman with:
George Westerman United States
Naomi Haefner Switzerland
Ann Ledwith Ireland
António Abreu Portugal
Frank Gertsen Denmark
Dirk Deschoolmeester Belgium
Carl Marnewick South Africa
Guido Capaldo Italy
Margaret Taylor United Kingdom
Bojаn Lаlić Serbia
Kim E. van Oorschot relative to George Westerman United States George Westerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
George Westerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim E. van Oorschot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim E. van Oorschot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim E. van Oorschot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim E. van Oorschot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim E. van Oorschot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim E. van Oorschot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim E. van Oorschot. The network helps show where Kim E. van Oorschot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim E. van Oorschot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim E. van Oorschot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim E. van Oorschot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim E. van Oorschot. Kim E. van Oorschot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 5
4 14
5 14
6 20
7 14
8 1
9 8
10 24
11 24
12 18
13 25
14 1
15 29
16 57
17
Ambidexterity and getting trapped in the suppression of exploration : a simulation model
3
18 39
19
Preventing or escaping the suppression mechanism: intervention conditions
63
20 1

About Kim E. van Oorschot

Kim E. van Oorschot is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research and Business and International Management, having authored 35 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (14 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (10 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (350 citations), Management Information Systems (200 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (223 citations). Kim E. van Oorschot has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Henk Akkermans, Luk N. Van Wassenhove, Bob Walrave, A.G.L. Romme, Kishore Sengupta, Fred Langerak, Hans Solli‐Sæther, Jan Terje Karlsen, Elco van Burg and Marianne Jahre. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Management Studies and Journal of Operations Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026