António Abreu

1.3k citations
70 papers · 653 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

António Abreu

63 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers

António Abreu
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 192
  • Strategy and Management 265
  • Management Information Systems 147
  • Business and International Management 24
  • Communication 54
Replace Željko Tekić with:
Željko Tekić Russia
Debasish N. Mallick United States
Aslan Amat Senin Malaysia
Pekka Kess Finland
Kim E. van Oorschot Norway
Raúl Rodríguez Rodríguez Spain
Giovanna Ferraro Italy
Corné Schutte South Africa
Maarit Tihinen Finland
Stefan Hüsig Germany
António Abreu relative to Željko Tekić Russia Željko Tekić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Željko Tekić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by António Abreu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of António Abreu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by António Abreu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites António Abreu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by António Abreu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by António Abreu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by António Abreu. The network helps show where António Abreu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside António Abreu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with António Abreu Line = papers co-authored together António Abreu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021114
2 200763
3 202034
4 200734
5 202029
6 200926
7 202122
8
A literature Review on Agility- Is There a Need to Develop a New Instrument?
202119
9 202119
10 202118
11 202116
12 201813
13 201812
14 201712
15 202011
16 201610
17 202210
18 201010
19 20209
20 20219

About António Abreu

António Abreu is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Communication, having authored 70 papers that have together received 653 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (18 papers), Collaboration in agile enterprises (17 papers), Quality and Supply Management (11 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (8 papers), Quality and Management Systems (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (6 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (192 citations), Strategy and Management (265 citations), Management Information Systems (147 citations), Business and International Management (24 citations) and Communication (54 citations). António Abreu has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Luís M. Camarinha-Matos, José Moleiro Martins, Mário Nuno Mata, J. M. F. Calado, Shumaila Naz, Shuja Iqbal, Shamim Akhtar, Patrícia Macedo, Luís Correia and Vítor Anes. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Applied Sciences, International Journal of Production Research, Production Planning & Control and European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact