Kevin Neailey

844 total citations
23 papers, 591 citations indexed

About

Kevin Neailey is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Kevin Neailey has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 591 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Management Information Systems, 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Kevin Neailey's work include Quality and Supply Management (9 papers), Product Development and Customization (4 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers). Kevin Neailey is often cited by papers focused on Quality and Supply Management (9 papers), Product Development and Customization (4 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers). Kevin Neailey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Mexico. Kevin Neailey's co-authors include James Meredith, Jannis Angelis, Amy Grove, Martin Barker, Rebecca Cain, Rajat Roy, Charles Tennant, W.H. Ip, P.A. McKeown and Andrew J. Harrison and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and International Journal of Information Management.

In The Last Decade

Kevin Neailey

22 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kevin Neailey United Kingdom 14 226 170 116 79 76 23 591
Howard S. Gitlow United States 15 229 1.0× 181 1.1× 94 0.8× 16 0.2× 88 1.2× 57 720
Per Langaa Jensen Denmark 14 186 0.8× 208 1.2× 70 0.6× 22 0.3× 88 1.2× 34 843
Thomas Pyzdek United States 10 308 1.4× 236 1.4× 155 1.3× 41 0.5× 29 0.4× 31 690
Håkan Wiklund Sweden 14 379 1.7× 330 1.9× 123 1.1× 68 0.9× 130 1.7× 41 712
Frenie Jiju Antony United Kingdom 9 370 1.6× 276 1.6× 116 1.0× 79 1.0× 116 1.5× 9 686
Yvonne Lagrosen Sweden 16 279 1.2× 243 1.4× 63 0.5× 33 0.4× 187 2.5× 44 790
Lewlyn L R Rodrigues India 12 112 0.5× 136 0.8× 54 0.5× 95 1.2× 104 1.4× 97 658
Wen‐Tsann Lin Taiwan 14 173 0.8× 95 0.6× 58 0.5× 45 0.6× 63 0.8× 36 428
Steven R. Gordon United States 15 256 1.1× 302 1.8× 55 0.5× 35 0.4× 64 0.8× 75 982
Roland R. Cavanagh 3 471 2.1× 332 2.0× 145 1.3× 21 0.3× 58 0.8× 5 752

Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Neailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Neailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Neailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Neailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Neailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Neailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Neailey. The network helps show where Kevin Neailey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kevin Neailey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kevin Neailey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kevin Neailey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kevin Neailey. Kevin Neailey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cain, Rebecca, et al.. (2018). Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 20(7). e243–e243. 12 indexed citations
2.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2017). Recruiting General Practitioners in England to Participate in Qualitative Research: Challenges, Strategies, and Solutions. University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford). 7 indexed citations
3.
Cain, Rebecca, et al.. (2016). Exploring Patients’ Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18(8). e217–e217. 18 indexed citations
4.
Cain, Rebecca, et al.. (2015). General Practitioners’ Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17(12). e276–e276. 33 indexed citations
5.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2015). A business process re-design methodology to support supply chain integration: Application in an Airline MRO supply chain. International Journal of Information Management. 35(5). 620–631. 31 indexed citations
6.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2014). Business process re-design methodology to support supply chain integration. International Journal of Information Management. 34(2). 167–176. 37 indexed citations
7.
Grove, Amy, et al.. (2010). Lean implementation in primary care health visiting services in National Health Service UK. BMJ Quality & Safety. 19(5). e43–e43. 51 indexed citations
8.
Grove, Amy, et al.. (2010). UK health visiting: challenges faced during lean implementation. Leadership in health services. 23(3). 204–218. 82 indexed citations
9.
McBeth, Christine, Charles Tennant, & Kevin Neailey. (2006). Developing products in the global environment using digital technology - a case study. 13. 1–8. 2 indexed citations
10.
Tennant, Charles, et al.. (2005). The development of a model to support synchronous change. Measuring Business Excellence. 9(3). 13–20. 8 indexed citations
11.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2003). A self-assessment tool for implementing concurrent engineering through change management. International Journal of Project Management. 21(6). 425–431. 22 indexed citations
12.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2003). Macrosegregation in thin walled castings produced via the direct squeeze casting process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 138(1-3). 306–310. 31 indexed citations
13.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2002). Achieving breakthrough performance improvement: results of implementing a fit‐for‐purpose total management system. The TQM Journal. 14(5). 293–296. 7 indexed citations
14.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (2002). A Risk Register Database System to aid the management of project risk. International Journal of Project Management. 20(5). 365–374. 88 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Martin, et al.. (2000). One‐stop‐shop information mall – MTR’s experience. Managing Service Quality. 10(2). 92–98. 2 indexed citations
16.
Barker, Martin & Kevin Neailey. (1999). From individual learning to project team learning and innovation: a structured approach. Journal of Workplace Learning. 11(2). 60–67. 47 indexed citations
17.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (1998). ISO 9004‐2 quality management system ‐ the way to world‐class service. Managing Service Quality. 8(6). 395–401. 1 indexed citations
18.
Neailey, Kevin, et al.. (1998). The establishment of an integrated management system ‐ a paradigm for railway engineering management. The TQM Journal. 10(6). 420–424. 18 indexed citations
19.
Neailey, Kevin. (1997). Innovation by Degrees. Industry and Higher Education. 11(1). 59–63. 1 indexed citations
20.
Howes, Tony, Kevin Neailey, Andrew J. Harrison, & P.A. McKeown. (1987). Fluid Film Boiling in Shallow Cut Grinding. CIRP Annals. 36(1). 223–226. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026