Ken Gale

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
58 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Ken Gale is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Education and Visual Arts and Performing Arts. According to data from OpenAlex, Ken Gale has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cultural Studies, 17 papers in Education and 15 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts. Recurrent topics in Ken Gale's work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (26 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (10 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (9 papers). Ken Gale is often cited by papers focused on Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (26 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (10 papers) and Participatory Visual Research Methods (9 papers). Ken Gale collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ken Gale's co-authors include Jonathan Wyatt, Steve Wheeler, Peter Kelly, Tami Spry, Bronwyn Davies, Susanne Gannon, Rebecca Turner, Elizabeth Atkinson, Jane Speedy and Ronald J. Pelias and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Mathematical Monthly and Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Ken Gale

55 papers receiving 963 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Handbook of Autoethnography

2013 509 citations Jonathan Wyatt, Ken Gale profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ken Gale United Kingdom	16	480	401	166	122	94	58	1.1k
Stacy Holman Jones United States	13	577 1.2×	326 0.8×	119 0.7×	154 1.3×	82 0.9×	73	1.3k
Tami Spry United States	12	451 0.9×	238 0.6×	137 0.8×	109 0.9×	144 1.5×	33	972
Susanne Gannon Australia	21	620 1.3×	510 1.3×	178 1.1×	114 0.9×	80 0.9×	98	1.3k
Jerry Rosiek United States	13	405 0.8×	370 0.9×	130 0.8×	125 1.0×	37 0.4×	31	923
Anna Hickey‐Moody Australia	17	621 1.3×	246 0.6×	160 1.0×	67 0.5×	129 1.4×	60	1.1k
Ronald J. Pelias United States	13	302 0.6×	165 0.4×	99 0.6×	119 1.0×	158 1.7×	65	763
Greg Dimitriadis United States	17	679 1.4×	527 1.3×	64 0.4×	123 1.0×	55 0.6×	60	1.4k
Deborah Reed‐Danahay United States	12	584 1.2×	283 0.7×	63 0.4×	85 0.7×	34 0.4×	31	1.1k
Julian Henriques United Kingdom	8	607 1.3×	291 0.7×	137 0.8×	225 1.8×	34 0.4×	19	1.5k
Gaile S. Cannella United States	21	915 1.9×	1.1k 2.8×	91 0.5×	82 0.7×	37 0.4×	62	1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Ken Gale

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken Gale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken Gale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken Gale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken Gale

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken Gale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken Gale. The network helps show where Ken Gale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken Gale

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken Gale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken Gale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken Gale. Ken Gale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Gale, Ken & Jonathan Wyatt. (2023). Between-ing: Collaborative Writing and the Unfoldings of Relational Space. Qualitative Inquiry. 31(1). 70–76. 1 indexed citations

2.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2020). Something Happened in the Room: Conceptualizing Intersubjectivation. International Review of Qualitative Research. 14(1). 67–86. 2 indexed citations

3.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2019). Deleuze and Collaborative Writing in the Dance of Activism. International Review of Qualitative Research. 12(3). 323–338. 2 indexed citations

4.

Gale, Ken & Jonathan Wyatt. (2018). Autoethnography and Activism: Movement, Intensity, and Potential. Qualitative Inquiry. 25(6). 566–568. 22 indexed citations

5.

Turner, Rebecca, et al.. (2016). Reflective writing: I wouldn’t start from here – examining a professional development initiative to enhance the scholarly activity of English HE in FE lecturers. Reflective Practice. 17(4). 430–443.

6.

Gale, Ken. (2015). Writing Minor Literature. Qualitative Inquiry. 22(5). 301–308. 10 indexed citations

7.

Wyatt, Jonathan & Ken Gale. (2014). Introduction to the Special Issue on Collaborative Writing as Method of Inquiry. Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies. 14(4). 295–297. 12 indexed citations

8.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2013). Action research, becoming and the assemblage: a Deleuzian reconceptualisation of professional practice. Educational Action Research. 21(4). 549–564. 11 indexed citations

9.

Wyatt, Jonathan & Ken Gale. (2013). Getting Out of Selves. 2 indexed citations

10.

Gale, Ken. (2013). Action research and the assemblage: engaging Deleuzian pedagogy and inquiry beyond the constraints of the individual and the group in education settings. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 27(5). 667–681. 6 indexed citations

11.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2013). Intensity. International Review of Qualitative Research. 6(1). 165–180. 21 indexed citations

12.

Gale, Ken & Jonathan Wyatt. (2012). Back to Futures. International Review of Qualitative Research. 5(4). 467–477. 5 indexed citations

13.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2012). Darkness and Silence. International Review of Qualitative Research. 5(4). 407–426. 3 indexed citations

14.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2011). Communities of praxis? Scholarship and practice styles of the HE in FE professional. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 63(2). 159–169. 14 indexed citations

15.

Gale, Ken. (2007). Teacher education in the university: working with policy, practice and Deleuze. Teaching in Higher Education. 12(4). 471–483. 20 indexed citations

16.

Gale, Ken, Steve Wheeler, & Peter Kelly. (2007). Learning in Cyberspace: An Examination of Changes in Professional Identity and Practice Style in an Online Problem-Based Learning Environment.. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 8(4). 297–307. 4 indexed citations

17.

Kelly, Peter, et al.. (2007). Taking a stance: promoting deliberate action through online postgraduate professional development. Technology Pedagogy and Education. 16(2). 153–176. 15 indexed citations

18.

Wheeler, Steve, Peter Kelly, & Ken Gale. (2005). The influence of online problem-based learning on teachers’ professional practice and identity. ALT-J. 13(2). 125–137. 22 indexed citations

19.

Atkinson, Elizabeth, et al.. (2003). Discourse, Power, and Resistance: Challenging the Rhetoric of Contemporary Education. 17 indexed citations

20.

Gale, Ken, et al.. (2002). Triadic Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 27(6). 557–567. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact