Ken A. Shackel

1.4k total citations
16 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Ken A. Shackel is a scholar working on Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ken A. Shackel has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Plant Science, 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Ken A. Shackel's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers). Ken A. Shackel is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (9 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (5 papers). Ken A. Shackel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Chile. Ken A. Shackel's co-authors include Mark A. Matthews, Hiroshi Wada, L. Carl Greve, John M. Labavitch, Andrew J. McElrone, Mark A. Matthews, Brendan Choat, Craig R. Brodersen, James R. Gohlke and Hamid Ahmadi and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of Experimental Botany.

In The Last Decade

Ken A. Shackel

16 papers receiving 981 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ken A. Shackel United States 13 861 332 239 120 103 16 1.0k
Hans R. Schultz United States 20 1.4k 1.6× 840 2.5× 502 2.1× 144 1.2× 146 1.4× 33 1.5k
Vivian Zufferey Switzerland 18 863 1.0× 396 1.2× 450 1.9× 72 0.6× 60 0.6× 81 981
Tommaso Frioni Italy 22 1.3k 1.6× 339 1.0× 594 2.5× 178 1.5× 72 0.7× 64 1.5k
J. Bonany Spain 14 641 0.7× 174 0.5× 98 0.4× 115 1.0× 173 1.7× 58 800
Chiara Pagliarani Italy 21 1.4k 1.6× 285 0.9× 174 0.7× 527 4.4× 55 0.5× 43 1.7k
Manuela David Portugal 12 661 0.8× 347 1.0× 73 0.3× 152 1.3× 60 0.6× 15 796
Robert C. Ebel United States 19 875 1.0× 139 0.4× 88 0.4× 132 1.1× 175 1.7× 66 1.0k
María Gómez del Campo Spain 23 1.1k 1.2× 362 1.1× 171 0.7× 100 0.8× 240 2.3× 65 1.2k
Philippe Vivin France 19 1.1k 1.3× 262 0.8× 371 1.6× 175 1.5× 77 0.7× 35 1.2k
V.O. Mogensen Denmark 15 666 0.8× 207 0.6× 168 0.7× 277 2.3× 191 1.9× 25 937

Countries citing papers authored by Ken A. Shackel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ken A. Shackel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ken A. Shackel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ken A. Shackel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ken A. Shackel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ken A. Shackel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ken A. Shackel. The network helps show where Ken A. Shackel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ken A. Shackel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ken A. Shackel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ken A. Shackel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ken A. Shackel. Ken A. Shackel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Shackel, Ken A., et al.. (2017). A model exploring whether the coupled effects of plant water supply and demand affect the interpretation of water potentials and irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management. 192. 271–280. 9 indexed citations
2.
Snyder, Richard L., et al.. (2017). Low and variable atmospheric coupling in irrigated Almond (Prunus dulcis) canopies indicates a limited influence of stomata on orchard evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management. 196. 57–65. 12 indexed citations
4.
Snyder, Richard L., et al.. (2016). Water stress causes stomatal closure but does not reduce canopy evapotranspiration in almond. Agricultural Water Management. 168. 11–22. 29 indexed citations
5.
Gambetta, Gregory A., Thomas L. Rost, Mark A. Matthews, et al.. (2013). Water Uptake along the Length of Grapevine Fine Roots: Developmental Anatomy, Tissue-Specific Aquaporin Expression, and Pathways of Water Transport  . PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 163(3). 1254–1265. 109 indexed citations
6.
Stewart, W. L., Allan Fulton, William H. Krueger, Bruce Lampinen, & Ken A. Shackel. (2011). Regulated deficit irrigation reduces water use of almonds without affecting yield. California Agriculture. 65(2). 90–95. 50 indexed citations
7.
Upadhyaya, Shrini K., et al.. (2011). Plant Water Stress Detection Using Leaf Temperature and Microclimatic Information. 2011 Louisville, Kentucky, August 7 - August 10, 2011. 2 indexed citations
8.
Choat, Brendan, et al.. (2010). Measurement of vulnerability to water stress-induced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to a long-vesseled species. Plant Cell & Environment. 33(9). no–no. 203 indexed citations
9.
Wada, Hiroshi, Mark A. Matthews, & Ken A. Shackel. (2009). Seasonal pattern of apoplastic solute accumulation and loss of cell turgor during ripening of Vitis vinifera fruit under field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 60(6). 1773–1781. 58 indexed citations
10.
Matthews, Mark A., et al.. (2008). Distinctive symptoms differentiate four common types of berry shrivel disorder in grape. California Agriculture. 64(3). 155–159. 49 indexed citations
12.
Wada, Hiroshi, Ken A. Shackel, & Mark A. Matthews. (2008). Fruit ripening in Vitis vinifera: apoplastic solute accumulation accounts for pre-veraison turgor loss in berries. Planta. 227(6). 1351–1361. 80 indexed citations
13.
Pérez-Donoso, Alonso G., L. Carl Greve, Jeffrey H. Walton, Ken A. Shackel, & John M. Labavitch. (2006). Xylella fastidiosa Infection and Ethylene Exposure Result in Xylem and Water Movement Disruption in Grapevine Shoots. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 143(2). 1024–1036. 68 indexed citations
14.
Matthews, Mark A., et al.. (2006). Direct in situ measurement of cell turgor in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries during development and in response to plant water deficits. Plant Cell & Environment. 29(5). 993–1001. 70 indexed citations
15.
Mignani, I., L. Carl Greve, Ruth Ben‐Arie, et al.. (1995). The effects of GA3 and divalent cations on aspects of pectin metabolism and tissue softening in ripening tomato pericarp. Physiologia Plantarum. 93(1). 108–115. 66 indexed citations
16.
Greve, L. Carl, et al.. (1994). Impact of Heating on Carrot Firmness: Contribution of Cellular Turgor. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 42(12). 2896–2899. 136 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026