Naïma Ben Ghozlen

11 total papers · 1.1k total citations
9 papers, 808 citations indexed

About

Naïma Ben Ghozlen is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Naïma Ben Ghozlen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 808 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Naïma Ben Ghozlen's work include Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). Naïma Ben Ghozlen is often cited by papers focused on Horticultural and Viticultural Research (7 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). Naïma Ben Ghozlen collaborates with scholars based in France, Italy and Germany. Naïma Ben Ghozlen's co-authors include Zoran G. Cerović, Gwendal Latouche, Claire Germain, Sylvie Meyer, Giovanni Agati, Marine Le Moigne, Nicolae Moise, Erhard E. Pfündel, Manfred Stoll and Susanne Tittmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Sensors and Physiologia Plantarum.

In The Last Decade

Naïma Ben Ghozlen

9 papers receiving 788 citations

Hit Papers

A new optical leaf‐clip m... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Naïma Ben Ghozlen 667 220 137 107 93 9 808
A. Cartelat 679 1.0× 230 1.0× 112 0.8× 144 1.3× 84 0.9× 8 884
Berta Lasa 750 1.1× 135 0.6× 129 0.9× 101 0.9× 44 0.5× 28 912
Gabriele Langsdorf 535 0.8× 145 0.7× 38 0.3× 201 1.9× 66 0.7× 14 706
Angelos C. Kyratzis 705 1.1× 115 0.5× 134 1.0× 92 0.9× 27 0.3× 31 934
V. Ostrovsky 531 0.8× 259 1.2× 139 1.0× 46 0.4× 232 2.5× 13 858
Aude Barbottin 646 1.0× 185 0.8× 55 0.4× 56 0.5× 42 0.5× 20 886
Eleftheria Zioziou 686 1.0× 78 0.4× 289 2.1× 95 0.9× 19 0.2× 16 735
Caroline Lelarge 631 0.9× 183 0.8× 46 0.3× 177 1.7× 36 0.4× 11 907
Luisa Leolini 774 1.2× 205 0.9× 347 2.5× 50 0.5× 29 0.3× 31 1.0k
Rudolf Klose 810 1.2× 89 0.4× 352 2.6× 186 1.7× 21 0.2× 13 889

Countries citing papers authored by Naïma Ben Ghozlen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naïma Ben Ghozlen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naïma Ben Ghozlen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naïma Ben Ghozlen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naïma Ben Ghozlen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naïma Ben Ghozlen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naïma Ben Ghozlen. The network helps show where Naïma Ben Ghozlen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naïma Ben Ghozlen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naïma Ben Ghozlen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naïma Ben Ghozlen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naïma Ben Ghozlen. Naïma Ben Ghozlen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026