W. L. Stewart
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Soil Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Walter F. MuegglerBruce LampinenSamuel MetcalfAllan FultonWilliam H. KruegerKen A. ShackelR. AllcroftLoreto Contador
- Topics
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (5 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
W. L. Stewart
14 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Plant Science 195
- Ecology 151
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 104
- Global and Planetary Change 104
- Soil Science 53
Countries citing papers authored by W. L. Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of W. L. Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. L. Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. L. Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. L. Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. L. Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. L. Stewart. The network helps show where W. L. Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. L. Stewart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. L. Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. L. Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. L. Stewart. W. L. Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Economic indicator maps for rural development in the East | 2 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 184 | |
| 14 | Grassland and shrubland habitat types of western Montana | 2 |
| 15 | Lameness and poor thriving in lambs on farms in old lead mining areas in the Pennines. 1. Field investi gations. | 15 |
About W. L. Stewart
W. L. Stewart is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Plant Science and Occupational Therapy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (5 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (5 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (104 citations), Ecology (151 citations) and Soil Science (53 citations). W. L. Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Walter F. Mueggler, Bruce Lampinen, Samuel Metcalf, Allan Fulton, William H. Krueger, Ken A. Shackel, R. Allcroft, Loreto Contador, Shrini K. Upadhyaya and Louise H. Comas. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Annals of Botany and Progress in brain research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.