Kathleen M. Gates
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 38
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 39
- Neural dynamics and brain function 10
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 6
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 7
-
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 6
-
- Online Learning and Analytics 5
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 5
- Co-authors
- Peter C. M. MolenaarAdriene M. BeltzStephanie LaneFrank G. HillaryAidan G.C. WrightTeague R. HenryDamien A. FairCara Arizmendi
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCameroon
In The Last Decade
Kathleen M. Gates
86 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Applied Psychology 255
- Clinical Psychology 517
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 230
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen M. Gates
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen M. Gates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen M. Gates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen M. Gates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen M. Gates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen M. Gates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen M. Gates. The network helps show where Kathleen M. Gates may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kathleen M. Gates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 103 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 17 |
About Kathleen M. Gates
Kathleen M. Gates is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (39 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (38 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (5 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.4k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Applied Psychology (255 citations). Kathleen M. Gates has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. M. Molenaar, Adriene M. Beltz, Stephanie Lane, Frank G. Hillary, Aidan G.C. Wright, Teague R. Henry, Damien A. Fair, Cara Arizmendi, Michael J. Rovine and Zachary F. Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.